Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Atomic energy is becoming more and more popular energy source. However, some people argue that nuclear power puts life on the Earth to danger. What is your opinion?

Atomic energy is becoming more and more popular energy source. However, some people argue that nuclear power puts life on the Earth to danger. What is your opinion? VaBD

It has been argued by some people that nuclear power, generated by atomic energy and which has been turned in a more common source of electricity, offers expressive risk to life on the planet, which I have many reasons to agree with. Firstly, nuclear power is not a clean source of energy, as it results in a production of nuclear pollution, which can potentially contaminate the soil and its underneath water, therefore resulting in serious consequences for plants and animals in the area. Secondly, different than other sources of energy, not only is a nuclear station more challenging to be safely working, but it is also more susceptive to nuclear accidents, as it has happened in the past, in Chernobyl, for instance. Given that small amounts of nuclear molecules are needed to produce giant quantity of energy, minimal human mistakes can be turned into giant catastrophes, which makes it the most dangerous source of energy amongst all exiting ones. Finally, atomic electricity generators could be easily converted in places to produce and store atomic bombs that could potentially be used to thread enemy countries, leading to a new world war, which would result in the end of all existing life on Earth, as it has been already told by war specialists. In conclusion, given that nuclear power has a huge potential to pollute the environment, provoking large catastrophes, and lead to a possible third world war, it is clear that it can certainly offer dangerous to the life on the planet and its use should be restricted and vanished when possible.

It has been argued
 by This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 that nuclear power, generated by atomic You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 and which has been turned
 in a more common You use this word too often, consider replacing it withorigincauseauthorityexpert
source
 of electricity, offers expressive This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazarddanger
risk
 to life on the planet, which I have This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 reasons to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesce
agree
 with.

Firstly
, nuclear power is not a clean You use this word too often, consider replacing it withorigincauseauthorityexpert
source
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
, as it results in a production of nuclear pollution, which can potentially
 contaminate the soil and its underneath water, therefore
 resulting in serious consequences for plants and animals in the area.

Secondly
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
Did you mean 'different "from"? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.from
than
 other You use this word too often, consider replacing it withorigincauseauthorityexpert
sources
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
, not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 is a nuclear station more challenging to be safely
 working, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 it is also
 more Possible spelling mistake found.susceptible
susceptive
 to nuclear accidents, as it has happened in the past, in Chernobyl, for instance
. This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accorded
Given
 that This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:tiny
small
 amounts of nuclear molecules are needed
 to produce giant quantity of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
, minimal human mistakes can be turned
 into giant catastrophes, which This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createsconstructsmanufacturesproduces
makes
 it the most This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:hazardousrisky
dangerous
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withorigincauseauthorityexpert
source
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 amongst all exiting ones.

Finally
, atomic electricity generators could be easily
 converted in places to produce and store atomic bombs that could potentially
 be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 to thread enemy countries, leading to a new world war, which would result in the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :expiration
end
 of all existing life on Earth, as it has been already This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :informed
told
 by war specialists.

In conclusion
, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accorded
given
 that nuclear power has a huge potential to pollute the environment, provoking large catastrophes, and lead to a possible third world war, it is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
 that it can certainly
 offer This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:hazardousrisky
dangerous
 to the life on the planet and its This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 should be restricted
 and vanished when possible. 