The importance of art can’t be denied because art influences our society by changing its opinion, instilling values and translating experiences. It communicates with the people who belong to different cultures and different times via painting, sounds and writing. Some people believe that artists should be given the liberty to express themselves. While, others think that there should have some laws to restrict them from freedom of expression. I also agree with the second point of view.
Firstly, art is a crucial part of the cultural heritage. Artist and culture both coexist, because they can’t live without each other. Some people consider that artists should have independence of expression for innovative work otherwise, restraints will take their ideas to other dimensions and would not express what they wanted to. Moreover, in the free atmosphere he can learn new skills and confidence which he can execute in his tasks and get success. In restrictions will not bring new ideas and perfume well. Consequently, he suffers from self-distrust that leads to failure. For example, 2 years ago a movie was made on a historical character named “padmawat" and was censored some of its scenes by authorities. Thus, after releasing, the movie got flopped and the producer had to face a great loss.
Nevertheless, some people believe, the government should have some laws to regulate the artists to maintain peace and harmony in our society. Because unnecessary emancipation of artists can put law and order situation in danger. For instance, a few years ago Nadeem had painted a nude portray of Hindu’s goddesses. It had created chaos in India and he had to seek an apology.
To conclude, there should be moderation in expressing yourself. differently will create disharmony in our society.
The importance of art can’t
be denied
because
art influences our society by changing its opinion, instilling values and translating experiences. It communicates with the
people
who belong to
different
cultures and
different
times via painting, sounds and writing.
Some
people
believe that
artists
should be
given
the liberty to express themselves.
While
, others
think
that there should have
some
laws to restrict them from freedom of expression. I
also
agree
with the second point of view.
Firstly
, art is a crucial part of the cultural heritage.
Artist
and culture both coexist,
because
they can’t
live
without each other.
Some
people
consider that
artists
should have independence of expression for innovative work
otherwise
, restraints will take their
ideas
to other dimensions and would not express what they wanted to.
Moreover
, in the free atmosphere he can learn new
skills
and confidence which he can execute in his tasks and
get
success. In restrictions will not bring new
ideas
and perfume well.
Consequently
, he suffers from self-distrust that leads to failure.
For example
, 2 years ago a movie
was made
on a historical character named “
padmawat
"
and
was censored
some
of its scenes by authorities.
Thus
, after releasing, the movie
got
flopped and the producer had to face a great loss.
Nevertheless
,
some
people
believe, the
government
should have
some
laws to regulate the
artists
to maintain peace and harmony in our society.
Because
unnecessary emancipation of
artists
can put law and order situation in
danger
.
For instance
, a few years ago
Nadeem
had painted a nude portray of Hindu’s goddesses. It had created chaos in
India and
he had to seek an apology.
To conclude
, there should be moderation in expressing yourself.
differently
will create disharmony in our society.