In this modern day and age, there has been a heated and ongoing debate about whether the school’s curriculum should consist of art and music subjects. Therefore, from my point of view, students should not be required to enroll in said type of classes for the following reasons.
First and foremost, art and music are considered gifted education, which indicates that some of the lesson-takers may not fit the classes. In particular, making these classes mandatory does not imply that every student will be interested in them, resulting in pupils not being able to pass due to not getting enough credits. To illustrate, statistics surrounding this issue have shown that in the US, students who have not earned full credit in the arts face an increasing risk of dropping out of high school every year during the study, contrasting with the highschoolers who chose to study the arts more intensely and have moved beyond the one-credit graduation requirement being the one at lowest risk of dropout.
Secondly, as I have stated before, some of the class-sitters, who may be completely uninterested in the subjects but are still forced to participate in the classes, are creating an unenthusiastic environment for the students that actually want to partake in the lessons. For instance, I myself as an art student have experienced the limited art supplies and materials being used up by those people, and several times me and my peers have had to go without, making it harder for us people who are genuinely interested in art to complete our assignments.
In conclusion, being well-rounded is something to strive for, but from my perspective, I believe that art and music classes should not be made compulsory for pupils for the aforementioned reasons. Hence, I think that each school’s curriculum should be constructed for students to be able to focus on their ability, in order to prepare them for their futures.
In this modern day and age, there has been a heated and ongoing debate about whether the school’s curriculum should consist of
art
and music subjects.
Therefore
, from my point of view,
students
should not
be required
to enroll in said type of
classes
for the following reasons.
First
and foremost,
art
and music
are considered
gifted education, which indicates that
some of the
lesson-takers may not fit the
classes
.
In particular
, making these
classes
mandatory does not imply that every
student
will
be interested
in them, resulting in pupils not being able to pass due to not getting
enough
credits. To illustrate, statistics surrounding this issue have shown that in the US,
students
who
have not earned full credit in the
arts
face an increasing
risk
of dropping out of high school every year during the study, contrasting with the
highschoolers
who
chose to study the
arts
more
intensely
and have
moved
beyond the one-credit graduation requirement being the one at lowest
risk
of dropout.
Secondly
, as I have stated
before
,
some of the
class
-sitters,
who
may be completely uninterested in the subjects
but
are
still
forced to participate in the
classes
, are creating an unenthusiastic environment for the
students
that actually want to partake in the lessons.
For instance
, I myself as an
art
student
have experienced the limited
art
supplies and materials being
used
up by those
people
, and several times me and my peers have had to go without, making it harder for us
people
who
are
genuinely
interested in
art
to complete our assignments.
In conclusion
, being well-rounded is something to strive for,
but
from my perspective, I believe that
art
and music
classes
should not
be made
compulsory for pupils for the aforementioned reasons.
Hence
, I
think
that each school’s curriculum should
be constructed
for
students
to be able to focus on their ability, in order to prepare them for their futures.