Almost everyone loves to read or see celebrity gossip. On television there are shows devoted to it, in newspapers we can find gossip coloms and there are magazines devoted to this topic alone. The internet and social media is another platform to share celebrity information, and the web is flodded with information about famous people from all over the world.
Some people may say that it is too much and it is too invasive, while others may argue that the lack of privacy is the price to pay for fame and furtune.
On one hand, celebrities enjoy the fruits of beening a famous person. They enjoy discounts, get privilaged treat wherever they go, and basicly the red carpet is always there for them.
In most cases the fame bears with a generous futun, and the fame come with dollar signs with it.
Some people will say that the lack of privacy is a small price to pay for all of that, and famous people can choose when to share and show themselves.
Nowadays pop culture got very invasive. The rise of the paparazzi started at the late '90s. The most familiar celebrity- paparazzi relationship that we know from that time is the one that Princess Diana had with the media, and we all know that that story ended in a terible way. Some people argue, myself included, that nowadays, 20 years later, it got worse and the invation to privacy esclated with social media in our lives. Today, Famous people find it harder to get off the grid and some of them even lock themselves at theire houses to avoid the sneaky paparazzi.
In conclusion, both sides have there fair point, on one hand celebrity do enjoy the benifits of beenig famous and their fans whant them to share it with them. On the other hand, people should deside what to share and what they would prefer to keep private. Pople should not be scared from rendom cameras thaking thier pics when they wish not to do so.
Almost everyone
loves
to read or
see
celebrity
gossip. On television there are
shows
devoted to it, in newspapers we can find gossip
coloms
and there are magazines devoted to this topic alone. The internet and social media is another platform to
share
celebrity
information, and the web is
flodded
with information about
famous
people
from all over the world.
Some
people
may say that it is too much and it is too invasive, while others may argue that the lack of privacy is the price to pay for fame and
furtune
.
On one hand,
celebrities
enjoy the fruits of
beening
a
famous
person. They enjoy discounts,
get
privilaged
treat wherever they go, and
basicly
the red carpet is always there for them.
In most cases
the fame bears with a generous
futun
, and the fame
come
with dollar signs with it.
Some
people
will say that the lack of privacy is a
small
price to pay for all of that, and
famous
people
can choose when to
share
and
show
themselves.
Nowadays pop culture
got
very
invasive. The rise of the paparazzi
started
at the late '90s. The most familiar
celebrity-
paparazzi relationship that we know from that time is the one that Princess Diana had with the media, and we all know that that story ended in a
terible
way.
Some
people
argue, myself included, that nowadays, 20 years later, it
got
worse and the
invation
to privacy
esclated
with social media in our
lives
.
Today
,
Famous
people
find it harder to
get
off the grid and
some
of them even lock themselves at
theire
houses
to avoid the sneaky paparazzi.
In conclusion
, both sides have there
fair
point, on one hand
celebrity
do enjoy the
benifits
of
beenig
famous
and their fans
whant
them to
share
it with them.
On the other hand
,
people
should
deside
what to
share
and what they would prefer to
keep
private.
Pople
should not
be scared
from
rendom
cameras
thaking
thier
pics when they wish not to do
so
.