Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Apersons worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old fashioned values such as honour, kindness and trust are no longer seem important? To what extent do you agree or disagree

Apersons worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old fashioned values such as honour, kindness and trust are no longer seem important? 5qkV
It is often argued that the individuals attributes is judged according to the social status and miscellaneous things in present days but traditional values such as morality are no longer beneficial. I totally agree with the statement because personal traits are denoted according to standard of living not with the affection. On the one hand, old fashioned values such as honour, kindness and trust is used to determine the good abilities of a person and judged from different perspectives in the past times. Furthermore, there were same person working in different fields with the similar abilities but they use to treat each and every person regarding the time. For example, people had a faith on each and every things and used to had trust with their relatives and the outer environment and they used to have kindness to every person. Further, with the change of time people are becoming conscious about the rich and poor and examined the social status of people in every sector, with this, people think morality is not important as it is judged through persons status in the society and material possessions. On the other hand, persons standard of living and material possessions have become crucial part to examine nowadays. moreover, it has prompted people believing righteous rather than trust or kindness while they think about luxury things from middle to high class families, as poor are being dominated through every prospects. Recent study shows that, people are becoming more conscious that honour, kindness and trust have gone far away, as with this, there is increase of hazardous things to people and personal lifestyle have dominated with this. However, the increasing demand of education and employment made more luxurious and want to make social status higher in the societies and want to make good material possessions. This tendency has good impact in the society but leads to negative results. In conclusion, there is no denying the fact that the people morality has become traditional where in the present days social status and material possession has become the beneficial part of people attributes to be judged.
It is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
argued that the individuals attributes is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
judged
according to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
social
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
status
and miscellaneous things in present days
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
traditional values such as morality are no longer beneficial. I
totally
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with the statement
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
personal traits
are denoted
according to standard of living not with the affection. On the one hand,
This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
old fashioned
values such as
Possible spelling mistake. 'honour' is British English.
honour
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
kindness
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trust
is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
to determine the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
abilities of a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
judged
from
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
perspectives in the past times.
Furthermore
, there were same
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
working in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
fields with the similar abilities
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
they
Make sure that 'use to' is correct. For habitual actions in the past or to mean 'accustomed to', use "used to".
use to
treat each and every
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
regarding the time.
For example
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
had a faith on each and every
The noun should be probably in the singular form: "thing"?
things
and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
to had
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trust
with their relatives and the outer
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
environment and
they
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
to have
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
kindness
to every
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
.
Further
, with the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
of time
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
are becoming conscious about the rich and poor and examined the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
social
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
status
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
in every sector, with this,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
morality is not
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
as it is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
judged
through
Apostrophe might be missing. Did you mean "persons'" or "person's"?
persons
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
status
in the society and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
material
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
possessions
.
On the other hand
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
persons
standard of living and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
material
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
possessions
have become crucial part to examine nowadays.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
moreover
, it has prompted
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
believing righteous
rather
than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trust
or
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
kindness
while they
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
about luxury things from middle to high
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
class
families, as poor are
being dominated
through every
The noun should be probably in the singular form: "prospect"?
prospects
. Recent study
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
that,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
are becoming more conscious that
Possible spelling mistake. 'honour' is British English.
honour
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
kindness
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trust
have gone far away, as with this, there is increase of hazardous things to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
and personal lifestyle have dominated with this.
However
, the increasing demand of education and employment made more luxurious and want to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
social
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
status
higher in the societies and want to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
material
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
possessions
. This tendency has
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
impact in the society
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
leads to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
results.
In conclusion
, there is no denying the fact that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
morality has become traditional where in the present days
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
social
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
status
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
material
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
possession
has become the beneficial part of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
attributes to be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
judged
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Apersons worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old fashioned values such as honour, kindness and trust are no longer seem important?

Essay
  American English
1 paragraphs
349 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts