Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree?

Many people believe that cars that run on petrol and diesel should be banned and electric cars should take their place. In my opinion, cars that run on fossil fuels should not be banned due to two main reasons. Firstly, the technology in electric cars has not fully developed yet and secondly environmental pollution by traditional cars, which is the main argument against them, is negligible when compared to other sources of pollution. The technology in electric cars is still in a state of development and there are many issues which need to be sorted out before they can replace traditional cars. First of all, the lithium-Ion batteries which power these cars are very expensive, which makes them out of reach of a common man. Furthermore, the time taken for a full charge is too high and the range of kilometres that the car can run on a single charge is too low. This makes these cars highly impractical as compared to traditional cars. For example, Various automobile companies have engineered many electric cars in the past decade but the only car in the world which has the right balance of charging speed and range is the newly launched Tesla, which at 50000$ is out of reach of most people. The main argument for banning cars that run on fossil fuels is their polluting nature. However, in reality the amount of pollution modern cars cause is negligible when compared to other human activities that cause pollution. : Industries and agriculture constitute the major chunk of overall air, water and noise pollution. An internal combustion engine which powers modern cars nowadays has been tweaked over the past 100 years to cause least environmental damage. As per a recent United Nations study, cars constitute only 3% of the total pollution levels. While factories and agriculture constitute 43% and 38% of the total pollution. In my opinion, banning traditional cars and replacing them with electric cars is neither practical till the technology irons out its limitation nor is it an answer to growing pollution levels.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Many
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
run
on petrol and diesel should
be banned
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electric
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
should take their place. In my opinion,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
run
on fossil fuels should not
be banned
due to two main reasons.
Firstly
, the technology in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electric
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
has not
fully
developed
yet
and
secondly
environmental
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traditional
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
, which is the main argument against them, is negligible when compared to other sources of pollution.

The technology in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electric
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
is
still
in a state of development and there are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
issues which need to
be sorted
out
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
they can replace
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traditional
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
.
First
of all, the lithium-Ion batteries which power these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
expensive, which
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
makes
them out of reach of a common
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
man
.
Furthermore
, the time taken for a full charge is too high and the range of kilometres that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
car
can
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
run
on a single charge is too low. This
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
makes
these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
highly
impractical as compared to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traditional
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
.
For example
, Various automobile
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
have engineered
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electric
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
in the past decade
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
car
in the world which has the right balance of charging speed and range is the
newly
launched Tesla, which at 50000$ is out of reach of most
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
.

The main argument for banning
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
run
on fossil fuels is their polluting nature.
However
, in reality the amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
modern
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
cause is negligible when compared to other human activities that cause
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
. : Industries and agriculture constitute the major chunk of
overall
air, water and noise
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
. An internal combustion engine which powers modern
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
nowadays has
been tweaked
over the past 100 years to cause least environmental damage. As per a recent United Nations study,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
constitute
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
3% of the total
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
levels. While factories and agriculture constitute 43% and 38% of the total pollution.

In my opinion, banning
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traditional
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
and replacing them with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electric
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
is neither practical till the technology irons out its limitation nor is it an answer to growing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
levels.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
342 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts