The role of advertisements in destroying individuality has sparked much debate in the recent times. Some people opine that advertisements eliminate individual sense of identity, making people indistinguishable from each other. l, however, disagree with this allegation.
To begin with, when any advertisement bombards people with any new product, then people rush to buy it and it appears that all people are doing the same. However, this similarity is very short-lived, as sooner or later they realize that it is a huge waste of time and money to spend on something that is not really appropriate for them. Therefore, ads cannot suppress individuality permanently.
Secondly, all people cannot afford all things shown in the adverts. Even when ads use famous celebs to endorse their products, and people want to purchase those things, even then they have to consider their pocket and requirement. For instance, when it comes to luxury goods, solely a marginal nunrber of purchasers can afford the financial cost. Therefore, no matter how attractive and persuasive an advertisement is, never can it tempt people to make the same purchase. Most people cannot afford to upset the whole monthly budget just because of certain alluring ads.
Furthermore, when we talk of the latest fashions, all people do not wear the similar clothes because of ads.
lf people wear jeans, it is because jeans are comfortable, and in today's fast life people need comfortable I clothes. Nowadays, everyone knows that only that fashion should be followed which suits them. lf adverts
show celebs in flared pants, those who are not blessed with a good height would surely not follow them.
To sum up, from what has been analyzed above, it is concluded that advertisement cannot dominate the market trends as all people have different requirements, different material wealth and different choices. lf at allthere are any similarities, they are very short lived.
The role of
advertisements
in destroying individuality has sparked much debate in the recent times.
Some
people
opine that
advertisements
eliminate individual sense of identity, making
people
indistinguishable from each other.
l
,
however
, disagree with this allegation.
To
begin
with, when any
advertisement
bombards
people
with any new product, then
people
rush to
buy
it and it appears that all
people
are doing the same.
However
, this similarity is
very
short-
lived
, as sooner or later they realize that it is a huge waste of time and money to spend on something
that is
not
really
appropriate for them.
Therefore
, ads cannot suppress individuality
permanently
.
Secondly
, all
people
cannot afford all things shown in the adverts. Even when ads
use
famous
celebs to endorse their products, and
people
want to
purchase
those things, even then they
have to
consider their pocket and requirement.
For instance
, when it
comes
to luxury
goods
,
solely
a marginal
nunrber
of purchasers can afford the financial cost.
Therefore
, no matter how attractive and persuasive an
advertisement
is, never can it tempt
people
to
make
the same
purchase
. Most
people
cannot afford to upset the whole monthly budget
just
because
of certain alluring ads.
Furthermore
, when we talk of the latest fashions, all
people
do not wear the similar clothes
because
of ads.
lf
people
wear jeans, it is
because
jeans are comfortable, and in
today
's
fast
life
people
need comfortable I
clothes
. Nowadays, everyone knows that
only
that fashion should
be followed
which suits them.
lf
adverts
show
celebs in flared pants, those who are not blessed with a
good
height would
surely
not follow them.
To sum up, from what has
been analyzed
above, it
is concluded
that
advertisement
cannot dominate the market trends as all
people
have
different
requirements,
different
material wealth and
different
choices.
lf
at
allthere
are any similarities, they are
very
short
lived
.