Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Today, the internet and TV have created that chance for ordinary people to become famous. Is it a positive or negative development?

Today, the internet and TV have created that chance for ordinary people to become famous. Is it a positive or negative development? 92Mx

Nowadays, digital media and television have provided the opportunity to amateur individuals to serve their talent, and reach the highest rank in society. I believe that this is a negative development because it is less fair for the actual professionals of media. The major negative effect is there will not be any distinction remain among professional and non-professionals. In other words, if anyone comes to channels, the actual authenticity of those channels can be demeaned. Moreover, no one will like to watch Programmes because it will become hard to distinguish between authentic and un-authentic ones. This experiment was tested on the public, back in March 2019, and experimenters have tested this thing in an actual website pro-Pakistani; they started showing the content which is not up-to-the-mark. As a result, the percentage of people who watch that program went down from 80% to 20%. Another negative impact is in the motivation of real people in the media industry. This means that they can feel demotivation because watching any random individuals on a high-ranked channel; they can feel that what the use of their hard work if there are not any criteria to follow. According to a news report last month, concrete persons left the well-known media because the media diminished their criteria of choosing people. That’s why, after leaving by the prominent people, the ranking dramatically went down, and also it observes demotivation among professionals. In conclusion, the opportunity for any random people leads to a decline in the motivation of the right stars, and the distinction line also can become a blur between actual stars and non-actual ones.

Nowadays, digital You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewstelevisionradiopublishing
media
 and television have provided the opportunity to amateur individuals to serve their talent, and reach the highest rank in society. I believe that this is a This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:adverse
negative
 development This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 it is less This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :equitable
fair
 for the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcertainsubstantialdefinitephysicalsubstantive
actual
 professionals of media.

The major This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:adverse
negative
 effect is there will not be any distinction remain among professional and non-professionals. In other words
, if anyone This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :approachesarrives
comes
 to channels, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcertainsubstantialdefinitephysicalsubstantive
actual
 authenticity of those channels can be demeaned
. Moreover
, no one Did you mean "would"?would
will
 like to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :monitor
watch
Possible spelling mistake. 'Programmes' is British English.Programs
Programmes
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 it will become This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :arduous
hard
 to distinguish between authentic and Possible spelling mistake found.unauthentic
un-authentic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsomeonewhoever
ones
. This experiment was This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :evaluated
tested
 on the public, back in March 2019, and experimenters have This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :evaluated
tested
 this thing in an You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcertainsubstantialdefinitephysicalsubstantive
actual
 website pro-Pakistani; they This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiated
started
 showing the content which is not up-to-the-mark. As a result
, the percentage of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 who This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :monitor
watch
 that program went down from 80% to 20%.

Another This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:adverse
negative
 impact is in the motivation of real You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewstelevisionradiopublishing
media
 industry. This means that they can feel Possible spelling mistake found.motivationdeactivationdemotivating
demotivation
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 watching any random individuals on a high-ranked channel; they can feel that what the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 of their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :arduous
hard
 work if there are not any criteria to follow. According to a news report last month, concrete persons This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :departed
left
 the well-known You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewstelevisionradiopublishing
media
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewstelevisionradiopublishing
media
 diminished their criteria of choosing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
. That’s why, after leaving by the prominent You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
, the ranking dramatically
 went down, and also
 it observes Possible spelling mistake found.motivationdeactivationdemotivating
demotivation
 among professionals.

In conclusion
, the opportunity for any random You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
If 'people' is plural here, don't use the third-person singular verb.lead
leads
 to a decline in the motivation of the right stars, and the distinction line also
 can become a blur between You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcertainsubstantialdefinitephysicalsubstantive
actual
 stars and non-actual You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsomeonewhoever
ones
. 