Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.

The plethora of people consider animal rights should be the same as human rights, and they should not be employed by people while another side supports animal can use for human benefits such as carrying, food and research. I will discuss both in terms of basic structure in the below paragraphs by force with equal right must be in all vital organism. There is a common belief that animals should have the same rights as humans. To reduce their using for food and research is inevitable necessary. Also, they can not employ by the people to get easier individuals' life. For instance, numerous researches based on animal experiments although another experiment model can be created without using vital animal species including rats, rabbit, monkey. In fact of that, scholars have not judged until in the last decades though people who are interested in animal rights. In my opinion, these types of researchers think another analysis previously. Therefore, animal rights, particularly life right can be saved. On the other hand, during centuries donkey, horse or other carrying animals have been serviced for the people. If societies develop an attitude using them is not harmful, it would be a compulsory thing to improve humanity. However, techno logic developments have replaced them. Due to employing animals is getting a decrease. It is a great example of it, a manager in a municipality gives extra financial to the farmers who discover multiple solutions regardless of the animal use. In conclusion, animals should have rights such as life, freedom like a human being. In addition to it, the people should be aware of their rights, and they should solve issues by thinking about other precautions to save them.

The plethora of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 consider You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withclaimlicensebusinesspowerfreedomauthority
rights
 should be the same as You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withclaimlicensebusinesspowerfreedomauthority
rights
, and they should not be employed
 by You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 while another side supports You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 can This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
 benefits such as carrying, food and research. I will discuss both in terms of basic structure in the below paragraphs by force with equal You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgoodlegalhonestappropriatelegitimateproper
right
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :require
must
 be in all vital organism.

There is a common belief that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 should have the same You use this word too often, consider replacing it withclaimlicensebusinesspowerfreedomauthority
rights
 as You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
. To This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alleviate
reduce
 their using for food and research is inevitable necessary. Also
, they can not employ by the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 easier individuals' life. For instance
, numerous researches based on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 experiments although another experiment model can be created
 without using vital You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 species including rats, rabbit, monkey. In fact of that, scholars have not judged until in the last decades though You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 who are interested
 in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withclaimlicensebusinesspowerfreedomauthority
rights
. In my opinion, these types of researchers This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 another analysis previously. Therefore
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withclaimlicensebusinesspowerfreedomauthority
rights
, particularly
 life You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgoodlegalhonestappropriatelegitimateproper
right
 can be saved
.

On the other hand
, during centuries donkey, horse or other carrying You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 have been serviced
 for the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
. If societies develop an attitude using them is not harmful, it would be a compulsory thing to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :ameliorate
improve
 humanity. However
, techno logic developments have replaced them. Due to employing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 is getting a decrease. It is a great example of it, a manager in a municipality gives extra financial to the farmers who discover multiple solutions regardless of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
.

In conclusion
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 should have You use this word too often, consider replacing it withclaimlicensebusinesspowerfreedomauthority
rights
 such as life, freedom like a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
 being. In addition
 to it, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 should be aware of their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withclaimlicensebusinesspowerfreedomauthority
rights
, and they should solve issues by thinking about other precautions to save them. 