Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge

A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge LD2p

Some people think that humans misuse animals as their own benefits, however others think that there is nothing wrong about it. It is our right to use them as scientific research and using as making products from them. This essay offers both groups of opinions. Firstly, people nowadays worried about animals because of cruelty of humans they suffer. So they raise voice against them. Who misuse their power and they have to stop now. This is very shameful that for food we wipe out entire species of animal or bird. For example, there are some species that extinct or be verge of extinction because of our action. Such as, rhinos, sparrow etc. They also demand equal right for animals because at some point if we are doing this same as we did at the end we have to face dire consequences of our action. Without animals the ecosystem going to fall and we will responsible for that. For the name of scientific research they do horrible things on animal as specific monkey. And we have no right to do it. On the other hand, the later group of people deny that animal should have their rights. Because they think that if we are going stop using animal as food what we are going to eat. There are some countries in world that they cannot grow some vegetables and crop because of geographic problem and weather. For surviving in cold people need to eat meat. And if we are not going to experiment on animal then whom it would be humans never be volunteering in research. And animals are liability if they die no one going to cry over them. Overall, it can be concluded that both sides are at some way right in my opinion I partially agree with both the groups. We need to find alternative and use less much of animals.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 that humans misuse You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 as their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :possess
own
 benefits, however
 others This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 that there is nothing This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:incorrect
wrong
 about it. It is our You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgoodlegalhonestappropriatelegitimateproper
right
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 them as scientific research and using as making products from them. This essay offers both groups of opinions.

Firstly
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 nowadays worried about You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of cruelty of humans they suffer. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
So
 they raise voice against them. Who misuse their power and they This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :terminateceasediscontinue
stop
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :nowadays
now
. This is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:extremelyimmenselysupremelysuperb
very
 shameful that for food we wipe Did you mean "our"?our
out
 entire species of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 or bird. For example
, there are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 species that extinct or be Consider using a past participle here: "verged".verged
verge
 of extinction This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of our action. Such as, rhinos, sparrow etc. They also
 demand equal You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgoodlegalhonestappropriatelegitimateproper
right
 for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 at This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 point if we are doing this same as we did at the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :expiration
end
 we This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
 face dire consequences of our action. Without You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 the ecosystem going to Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).fall, and
fall and
 we The word 'responsible' is a noun or an adjective. A verb or adverb is missing or misspelled here, or maybe a comma is missing.
will responsible
 for that. For the name of scientific research they do horrible things on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 as specific monkey. And we have no You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgoodlegalhonestappropriatelegitimateproper
right
 to do it.

On the other hand
, the later group of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 deny that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 should have their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withclaimlicensebusinesspowerfreedomauthority
rights
. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
Because
 they This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 that if we are going This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :terminateceasediscontinue
stop
 using You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 as food what we are going to eat. There are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 countries in world that they cannot grow This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 vegetables and crop This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of geographic problem and weather. For surviving in This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :chillyfrosty
cold
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 need to eat meat. And if we are not going to experiment on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 then whom it would be humans never be volunteering in research. And You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 are liability if they This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :pass away
die
 no one going to cry over them.

Overall
, it can be concluded
 that both sides are at This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 way You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgoodlegalhonestappropriatelegitimateproper
right
 in my opinion I partially
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesce
agree
 with both the groups. We need to find alternative and This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 less much of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
. 