Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. KB1L

Nowadays, a rising number of individuals are opposing animal exploitation by people and they also believe that animals should have the same rights as human beings. While other fellows believe that animals must be used to satisfy their various needs such as food and research stuff. In this essay, I am going to discuss both of these perspectives of the people living in the society. Currently, the individuals are getting to know that the animals also feel as same as human beings and they are not supposed to get slaughtered by the people for their needs. Animals are living beings who deserve the right to live and exist among us. And no human has the right to slaughter them for their personal needs. On the other hand, there are non-vegetarian people who eat animal meat as it is a part of their daily diet. They consume animal products for eating as well as for other needs. Some rich individuals like to hang animals' bones as a showpiece and animal skin as a carpet at their homes, which shows the luxury they can afford. Sometimes, these things are sold illegally to the consumers. Many creatures are used for research purposes too. For example, when scientists want to test some kind of an injection containing a virus or a vaccine, they will test the product first on animals like rats and monkeys. They do this to ensure if the product is safe for human beings or not. Well, this is a necessary thing, if it is not done, and the product is not safe as well, it can cause harm to human beings. In my opinion, both peoples' perspective is correct and also debatable. But we, the humans, are the consumers. We use animal products in multiple places such as clothing, car accessories, medicines, food, and many more. Wallets, belts, and shoes are also made from animal skin. And I think, it is one of our necessities including the research on animals. We human beings are maintaining the food chain as well as the animal population. But, we shouldn't kill the endangered species as most of them are also maintaining the food chain and the increasing animal population.

Nowadays, a rising number of individuals are opposing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 exploitation by Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).people, and
people and
 they also
 believe that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 should have the same rights as You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
 beings. While other fellows believe that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :require
must
 be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 to satisfy their various needs such as You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
 and research stuff. In this essay, I am going to discuss both of these perspectives of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 living in the society.

Currently
, the individuals are getting to know that the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
also
 feel as same as You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).beings, and
beings and
 they are not supposed to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 slaughtered by the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 for their needs. You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
Animals
 are living beings who deserve the right to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reside
live
 and exist among us. And no You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
 has the right to slaughter them for their personal needs.

On the other hand
, there are non-vegetarian You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 who eat You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 meat as it is a part of their daily diet. They consume You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommodityprofitbrandworkamountcrop
products
 for eating as You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrongtogether
well
 as for other needs. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
 rich individuals like to hang animals' bones as a showpiece and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 skin as a carpet at their homes, which This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demonstratesportraysindicatesdisplays
shows
 the luxury they can afford. This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :in some instances
Sometimes
, these things are sold
illegally
 to the consumers. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
Many
 creatures are This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 for research purposes too. For example
, when scientists want to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :evaluate
test
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
If 'kind' is a classification term, 'an' is not necessary. Use "kind of". (The phrases 'kind of' and 'sort of' are informal if they mean 'to some extent'.)kind of
kind of an
 injection containing a virus or a vaccine, they will This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :evaluate
test
 the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommodityprofitbrandworkamountcrop
product
first
 on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 like rats and monkeys. They do this to ensure if the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommodityprofitbrandworkamountcrop
product
 is safe for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
 beings or not. You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrongtogether
Well
, this is a necessary thing, if it is not done, and the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommodityprofitbrandworkamountcrop
product
 is not safe as You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrongtogether
well
, it can cause harm to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
 beings.

In my opinion, both peoples' perspective is correct and also
 debatable. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
But
 we, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
, are the consumers. We This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcommodityprofitbrandworkamountcrop
products
 in multiple places such as clothing, car accessories, medicines, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
, and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 more. Wallets, belts, and shoes are also
 made from You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 skin. And I This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
, it is one of our necessities including the research on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
. We You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
 beings are maintaining the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
 chain as You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrongtogether
well
 as the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 population. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
But
, we shouldn't kill the endangered species as most of them are also
 maintaining the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
 chain and the increasing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 population. 