Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.

A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. 7XJy
Some people believe that the homo sapiens are not entitled to endanger the life of an animal in order to cater his personal benefits. While others are in a view point that the man can master all the other living beings on the earth in order to satisfy his day to day needs. This essay will delve in to both the opinions and reach a logical conclusion. Those who are opposing the disgusting treatment of wild life by humans believe that all the creatures in the world have equal rights to live and no one is licensed to hinder the life of each other. They are in a viewpoint that the man is also an animal evolved from the monkeys and only have the same right towards the ecosystem and is not granted to dominate other living beings for his needs like food, studies etc. In their opinion, humans can also be herbivorous and live their life peacefully without taking the lives of innocent living creatures. The scientific studies with living animals are also not supported by the people who are in love with animal life. They are proposing other methods for the researches rather than putting a life on knife. Recently, american government forced to enforce some strict laws to ensure animal life protection resulting from hunting as the proponents of animal life save movements started their protests in front of the white house. The people who are thinking about taking the life of animals as a granted gifted from god are treating them only as a means of getting the things done and for making the life easier. In their opinion god gives the human the capability to think and this ability differentiates them from other living beings and so employing animals to make the tasks easier is not a crime. In their view point, animals flesh is full of nutrients that are beneficial to the health and one should not feel guilty on killing an animal for the basic need like food. They support their argument by pointing the plenty availability of wild life on our ecosystem and their harmful effects on cultivated areas as a reason for chopping them. To summarize, Both the sides have various points that are supporting and against the use of innocent wild life by humans i am personally in opinion that the mankind should not treat animals as slaves and their engagement for the human's sole benefits cannot be justified as their contributions are really needed for keeping the balance of our ecological system and in no ways man can threaten their life.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
believe that the homo sapiens are not entitled to endanger the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
of an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
in order to cater his personal benefits.
“While” at the beginning of a sentence usually requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
While
others are in a view point that the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
man
can master all the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
living
beings on the earth in order to satisfy his
It appears that two hyphens are missing.
day to day
needs. This essay will delve in to both the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
opinions
and reach a logical conclusion.

Those who are opposing the disgusting treatment of wild
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
believe that all the creatures in the world have equal rights to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
and no one
is licensed
to hinder the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
of each
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
. They are in a viewpoint that the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
man
is
also
an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
evolved from the monkeys and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
have the same right towards the ecosystem and is not granted to dominate
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
living
beings for his needs like food, studies etc. In their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
opinion
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
can
also
be herbivorous and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
peacefully
without taking the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
of innocent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
living
creatures. The scientific studies with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
living
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
are
also
not supported by the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
who are in
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
love
with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
. They are proposing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
methods for the researches
rather
than putting a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
on knife. Recently,
Possible spelling mistake found.
american
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
forced to enforce
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
strict laws to ensure
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
protection resulting from hunting as the proponents of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
save movements
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
started
their protests in front of the white
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
house
.

The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
who are thinking about taking the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
as a granted gifted from god are treating them
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
as a means of getting the things done and for making the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
easier. In their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
opinion
god gives the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
the capability to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
and this ability differentiates them from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
living
beings and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
employing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
the tasks easier is not a crime. In their view point,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
flesh is full of nutrients that are beneficial to the health and one should not feel guilty on killing an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
for the basic need like food. They support their argument by pointing the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
plenty
availability of wild
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
on our ecosystem and their harmful effects on cultivated areas as a reason for chopping them.

To summarize
, Both the sides have various points that are supporting and against the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of innocent wild
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
Is this the personal pronoun "I"? It is spelled uppercase.
i
am
personally
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
opinion
that the mankind should not treat
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
as slaves and their engagement for the
Possible typo. Did you mean: "human sole"?
human's sole
benefits cannot
be justified
as their contributions are
really
needed for keeping the balance of our ecological system and in no ways
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
man
can threaten their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
432 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts