Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

3D Electroporation Device using Microbeads Enhanced Electric Field for Bacterial Inactivation

3D Electroporation Device using Microbeads Enhanced Electric Field for Bacterial Inactivation XG7KA
This paper presents the use of insulator-based dielectrophoresis (iDEP) device comprising of densely packed silica beads that achieved high bacterial inactivation performance (~ 4. 75 log removal). In the device, insulating silica microbeads were packed between two mesh electrodes that enabled the enhancement of the local electric field strength allowing electroporation of bacterial cells. The inactivation performance of the device was evaluated using two model bacteria including one Gram-positive bacterium (Enterococcus Faecalis) and one Gram-negative bacterium (Escherichia coli) under various applied voltages. More than 4. 5 log removal of bacteria was obtained for the applied electric field strength of 2 kV/cm at a flowrate of 4 mL/min. The effect of microbeads on the inactivation performance was assessed by comparing the performance of the microbead device with that of the device having no microbeads; operating under same operating conditions. Results suggest that only 0. 57 log removal was achieved for the device having no microbeads which was 8 folds lower than the device with microbeads.
This paper presents the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of insulator-based
Possible spelling mistake found.
dielectrophoresis
(
Possible spelling mistake found.
iDEP
)
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
device
Did you mean "comprising" or "consisting of"?
comprising of
densely
packed silica beads that achieved high bacterial inactivation
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
performance
(~ 4. 75 log removal). In the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
device
, insulating silica
Possible spelling mistake found.
microbeads
were packed
between two mesh electrodes that enabled the enhancement of the local electric field strength allowing
Possible spelling mistake found.
electroporation
of bacterial cells. The inactivation
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
performance
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
device
was evaluated
using two model bacteria including one Gram-
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
positive
bacterium (
Possible spelling mistake found.
Enterococcus
Possible spelling mistake found.
Faecalis
) and one Gram-
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
bacterium (Escherichia coli) under various applied voltages. More than 4. 5 log removal of bacteria
was obtained
for the applied electric field strength of 2
Possible spelling mistake found.
kV
/cm at a
Possible spelling mistake found.
flowrate
of 4 mL/min. The effect of
Possible spelling mistake found.
microbeads
on the inactivation
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
performance
was assessed
by comparing the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
performance
of the
Possible spelling mistake found.
microbead
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
device
with that of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
device
having no
Possible spelling mistake found.
microbeads
; operating under same operating conditions. Results suggest that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
0. 57 log removal
was achieved
for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
device
having no
Possible spelling mistake found.
microbeads
which was 8 folds lower than the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
device
with
Possible spelling mistake found.
microbeads
.

IELTS essay 3D Electroporation Device using Microbeads Enhanced Electric Field for Bacterial Inactivation

Essay
  American English
1 paragraphs
164 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
4.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • 3D Electroporation Device using Microbeads Enhanced Electric Field for Bacterial Inactivation