Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

1. Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most large companies. However, some people think that interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 2

1. Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most large companies. However, some people think that interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. 2 G2Q2
Recruiting new employees can be a long and painful process. The success of any business or organisation depends on the quality of its staff. Some employers conduct interviews to select new workers. I disagree with the given statement, which says that interview is not a reliable method, and other methods are better. A number of arguments surround my opinion. There are many reasons why interview is a preferred method of selection of new employees. To begin with, interview is one of the only methods in which the recruiters can get an idea about the personality and social skills of the potential employees. In interviews, there is face-to-face interaction and the candidates have to answer impromptu questions, which leaves very little scope for hiding personality traits. Also employees can judge traits like ability to handle pressure, confidence and ability to think outside the box and so on by asking some case study type questions. To add to it, employers can check if the person is a right fit for the company on the social level by assessing his strengths, weaknesses, long term desires. Admittedly, interview is not the only method, and there are many other selection methods with varied advantages. One of other common methods is written test. This method is preferred when the focus in on judging the theoretical knowledge of the person. Another conventional selection basis is group discussion. This method is good where a major job requirement of the company is conversational skills for instance sales jobs. Sales personnel need to have good persuasion skills. Group discussion can determinc the convincing power of an individual. Last but not the least, there can be combination of the all, he three methods like written tests, followed by group discussion and finally interviews. This method is the most thorough of all the methods checking everything from personality traits to knowledge and also communication ability. is evident that different methods have different advantages and the best method cannot be singled out. It depends upon me situation. For example, interviews assess a person's individual traits better whereas written tests are more about knowledge and expertise in an area. There are shortcomings of every method too for example there is a chance of personal as in interviews. The combination of methods can take too long to select a candidate and may be too expensive to onduct for small companies conclude, I cannot agree that interview is not reliable method and other methods are better. It depends upon the job d company requirement, in some situations conducting interviews is more apt and in some situations the other methods ay be more advantageous.
Recruiting new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
can be a long and painful process. The success of any business or
Possible spelling mistake. 'organisation' is British English.
organisation
depends on the quality of its staff.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
employers conduct
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
to select new workers. I disagree with the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
statement, which says that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is not a reliable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
, and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
methods
are better. A number of arguments surround my opinion.

There are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
reasons why
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is a preferred
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
of selection of new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
. To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begin
with,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is one of the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
methods
in which the recruiters can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
an
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
about the personality and social
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
of the potential
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
. In
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
, there is face-to-face interaction and the candidates
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
answer impromptu questions, which
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
leaves
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
little
scope for hiding personality
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traits
.
Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Also
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
can judge
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traits
like ability to handle pressure, confidence and ability to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
outside the box and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
on by asking
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
case study type questions. To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
add
to it, employers can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
check
if the person is a right fit for the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
company
on the social level by assessing his strengths, weaknesses, long term desires.

Admittedly
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is not the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
, and there are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
selection
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
methods
with varied advantages. One of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
common
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
methods
is written
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
test
. This
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
is preferred
when the focus in on judging the theoretical knowledge of the person. Another conventional selection basis is group discussion. This
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
where a major job requirement of the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
company
is conversational
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
for instance
sales jobs. Sales personnel need to have
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
persuasion
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
. Group discussion can
Possible spelling mistake found.
determinc
the convincing power of an individual. Last
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
not the least, there can be combination of the all, he three
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
methods
like written
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tests
, followed by group discussion and
finally
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
. This
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
is the most thorough of all the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
methods
checking everything from personality
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traits
to knowledge and
also
communication ability.

This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
is
evident that
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
methods
have
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
advantages and the best
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
cannot
be singled
out. It depends upon me situation.
For example
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
assess a person's individual
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traits
better whereas written
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tests
are more about knowledge and expertise in an area. There are shortcomings of every
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
too
for example
there is a chance of personal as in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
. The combination of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
methods
can take too long to select a candidate and may be too expensive to
Possible spelling mistake found.
onduct
for
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
small
Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraph
companies


This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
conclude
, I cannot
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is not reliable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
methods
are better. It depends upon the job d
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
company
requirement, in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
situations conducting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
is more apt and in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
situations the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
Possible spelling mistake found.
methods ay
be more advantageous.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay 1. Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most large companies. However, some people think that interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. 2

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
437 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • 1. Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most large companies. However, some people think that interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 2