Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Waste Recycling rates in the U.S. from 1960 to 2011

Waste Recycling rates in the U. S. from 1960 to 2011 963yp

The line graph compares the recycling rates in the U. S. (1960 - 2011) to the total waste recovery during the same timeframe. On the whole the total waste recovery is on a higher ground compared to the percent recycling. Getting back to the details, there's been an exponential rise of 1551% in the waste recovery from the 1960's to the 2011's but the recovery rate seems to be growing at a slower pace, which is truly alarming. Though the recycling rate has been increasing well since the 1990's its still isn't sufficient to erase the footprints of human in the waste recovery. It truly seems like 2011 was an amazing year for recovery with over 34% of the waste being recovered, but that was just about 30 million tons. Over the years there is only the possibility of the total waste recovery increasing with the increase in population, and with the current pace of things in the recovery things look very grim for us and the planet Earth in the course of the future.

The line graph compares the recycling rates in the U. S. (Consider using an n-dash (half dash), if you want to indicate numerical ranges or time ranges.1960 – 20111960–2011
1960 - 2011
) to the total You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmisuse
waste
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withreturnimprovementresumptionreadjustmentrestorationreconstruction
recovery
 during the same timeframe. On the whole
 the total You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmisuse
waste
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withreturnimprovementresumptionreadjustmentrestorationreconstruction
recovery
 is on a higher ground compared to the percent recycling.

Getting back to the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :particulars
details
, there's been an exponential rise of 1551% in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmisuse
waste
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withreturnimprovementresumptionreadjustmentrestorationreconstruction
recovery
 from the Apostrophes aren't needed for decades: "1960s".1960s
1960's
 to the 2011's This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withreturnimprovementresumptionreadjustmentrestorationreconstruction
recovery
 rate seems to be growing at a slower pace, which is truly
 alarming. Though the recycling rate has been increasing well since the Apostrophes aren't needed for decades: "1990s".1990s
1990's
Did you mean "it's" (="it is") instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?it'sit is
its
still
 isn't sufficient to erase the footprints of human in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmisuse
waste
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withreturnimprovementresumptionreadjustmentrestorationreconstruction
recovery
. It truly
 seems like 2011 was an amazing year for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withreturnimprovementresumptionreadjustmentrestorationreconstruction
recovery
 with over 34% of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmisuse
waste
being recovered
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 that was This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 about 30 million tons.

Over the years there is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 the possibility of the total You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmisuse
waste
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withreturnimprovementresumptionreadjustmentrestorationreconstruction
recovery
 increasing with the increase in population, and with the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :contemporarymodern
current
 pace of things in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withreturnimprovementresumptionreadjustmentrestorationreconstruction
recovery
 things look This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:extremelyimmenselysupremelysuperb
very
 grim for us and the planet Earth in the course of the future. 