Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Two charts below show the percentage of qualified graduated in particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.

Two charts below show the percentage of qualified graduated in particular country. DXMW
The provided pie charts compare, one nation's Arts and Science stream degree holders proportion in 1980 and 2008. At the first glance, over the 28 years period, in both stream first degree holders ratio deteriorated. Overall, over the given period hefty proportion of people preferred to study in phd compare to previous record. Whereas, masters degrees was obtained by almost same proportion of learner in both years. According to the given data, In 1980 around three fifths proportion of individuals chose to study in science stream, specifically around 29% in master science, almost fifth proportion in first degree science and around 13% in Phd science. In contrast, compare to science master degree holder, more than half proportion favour to study in arts master degree, which was 12%. Likewise, in arts phd merely 2% students joined. But, first degree arts was taken by a quarter proportion pupils. As per the pie chart of 2008, that compare to 1980, science stream phd students ratio was escalated by more than double and arts phd ratio surged by more than thrice, which was 30% and 7% respectively. On the other hand, over the period first degree students ratio fallen by around half proportion in both faculties. Which was 10% and 11% in Science and Arts stream respectively. Master degrees was still preferred by almost same proportion people.
The provided pie charts
compare
, one nation's
Arts
and
Science
stream
degree
holders
proportion
in 1980 and 2008. At the
first
glance, over the 28 years period, in both
stream
first
degree
holders
ratio
deteriorated.

Overall
, over the
given
period hefty
proportion
of
people
preferred to study in
phd
compare
to previous record.
Whereas
,
masters
degrees
was obtained
by almost same
proportion
of learner in both years.

According to the
given
data, In 1980
around
three fifths
proportion
of individuals chose to study in
science
stream
,
specifically
around
29% in
master
science
, almost fifth
proportion
in
first
degree
science
and
around
13% in
Phd
science
.
In contrast
,
compare
to
science
master
degree
holder, more than half
proportion
favour
to study in
arts
master
degree
, which was 12%.
Likewise
, in
arts
phd
merely
2% students
joined
.
But
,
first
degree
arts
was taken
by a quarter
proportion
pupils.

As per the pie chart of 2008, that
compare
to 1980,
science
stream
phd
students
ratio
was escalated
by more than double and
arts
phd
ratio
surged by more than thrice, which was 30% and 7%
respectively
.
On the other hand
, over the period
first
degree
students
ratio
fallen by
around
half
proportion
in both faculties. Which was 10% and 11% in
Science
and
Arts
stream
respectively
.
Master
degrees
was
still
preferred by almost same
proportion
people
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic Two charts below show the percentage of qualified graduated in particular country.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
223 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts