Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Report for imprisonment in country

Report for imprisonment in country lpjQ

The bar chart below compares the number of prisoners (in thousand )caught in five different countries (Great Britan, Australia, New Zealand, United States, Canada) over the years 1930 to 1980. It is clear that the numbers of imprisonment in the USA and Canada are slightly higher over the years compared to the rest of the countries. On the other hand, the figures for Great Britain have been considerably low. At the same time, it is moderate in Australia and New Zealand. In the year between 1930 and 1950, the countries experiencing a significant amount of imprisonments were America and Canada, which was around 100 -150 thousand. In 1930 New Zealand imprisonment activity was 100 thousand, which was the same as in America; after that, it saw a downfall by almost half in the next two decades. Great Britain, on the contrary, figures of Britain were between 20-40 thousand and were subsequently low than other five countries. After the mid-1900s, the prisoners' rates rose in America and Great Britain, where Canada saw a fall by 20-40 thousand. Although the figures kept slightly fluctuating between 50 -60 thousand for Australia, they were relatively stable for New Zealand.

The bar chart below compares the number of prisoners (in Use "a thousand" or use a number before 'thousand'.a thousand
thousand
Don't put a space before the closing parenthesis)
 )
caught in five This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
 countries

(Great Possible spelling mistake found.BritainBrianBritonBrit an
Britan
, Australia, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
New
 Zealand, United States, Canada) over the years 1930 to 1980.

It is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
 that the numbers of imprisonment in the USA and Canada are slightly
 higher over the years compared to the rest of the countries. On the other hand
, the figures for Great Britain have been considerably
 low. At the same time, it is moderate in Australia and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
New
 Zealand.

In the year between 1930 and 1950, the countries experiencing a significant amount of imprisonments Possible agreement erroris
were
 America and Canada, which was around 100 -150 thousand. In 1930 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
New
 Zealand imprisonment activity was 100 thousand, which was the same as in America; after that, it This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witnessed
saw
 a downfall by almost half in the next
 two decades. Great Britain, on the contrary
, figures of Britain were between 20-40 thousand and were subsequently
Use "lower" to make a comparison with this adjective.lower
low
 than other five countries.

After the mid-1900s, the prisoners' rates rose in America and Great Britain, where Canada This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witnessed
saw
 a fall by 20-40 thousand. Although the figures This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :retained
kept
slightly
 fluctuating between 50 -60 thousand for Australia, they were relatively
 stable for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
New
 Zealand. 