Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006. 8YBV
The table compares the market share of the leading mobile phone producers in the world in 2005 and 2006. At first glance, in 2005 and 2006, the proportion for Nokia was the highest among the other companies at 32, 5% and 35% respectively. The other competitor was true for Motorola, which accounted for 17, 7% in 2005 and then it rose slightly to 21, 1% in 2006, stayed at the second place only after Nokia. The rising of market share was seen by Sony Ericsson, which had a more modest increase from 6, 3% to 7, 4% in these two years. In contrast, the market share of Samsung made up for 12, 7% in 2005 before going down sìgnificantly to 11, 8% in 2006, whereas, the sales of LG dropped more slightly from 6, 7% to 6, 3% in these two years. Likewise, BenQ Mobile saw a substantially decline to half of its rate within 1 year, from 4, 9% in 2005 to 2, 4% in 2006. Finally, there was a fall in the market share of other phone companies, which accounted for 19, 2% of the market in 2005 and immediately fell to 16, 2% in 2006. Overall, it reveals that Nokia, Motorola and Sony Ericsson developed their market share, especially, Nokia held a largest market share of the global market in both years while most of the companies witnessed a fall of the market share.
The table compares the
market
share
of the leading mobile phone producers in the world in 2005 and 2006.

At
first
glance, in 2005 and 2006, the proportion for Nokia was the highest among the other
companies
at 32, 5% and 35%
respectively
. The other competitor was true for Motorola, which accounted for 17, 7% in 2005 and then it rose
slightly
to 21, 1% in 2006, stayed at the second place
only
after Nokia. The rising of
market
share
was
seen
by Sony Ericsson, which had a more modest increase from 6, 3% to 7, 4% in these two years.

In contrast
, the
market
share
of Samsung made up for 12, 7% in 2005
before
going down sì
gnificantly
to 11, 8% in 2006, whereas, the sales of LG dropped more
slightly
from 6, 7% to 6, 3% in these two years.
Likewise
,
BenQ
Mobile
saw
a
substantially decline
to half of its rate within 1 year, from 4, 9% in 2005 to 2, 4% in 2006.
Finally
, there was a fall in the
market
share
of other phone
companies
, which accounted for 19, 2% of the
market
in 2005 and immediately fell to 16, 2% in 2006.

Overall
, it reveals that Nokia, Motorola and Sony Ericsson developed their
market
share
,
especially
, Nokia held
a
largest
market
share
of the global
market
in both years while most of the
companies
witnessed a fall of the
market
share
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
237 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts