Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The table compares the energy production by different source in UK

The table compares the energy production by different source in UK Vya1J
The provided table chart depicts, the information about the comparison of energy production by natural gas, oil coal, nuclear power and hydropower during time period in 1990, 1996 and 2000 in UK. In 1990, energy production by natural gas was 76 million tonnes. The energy production by natural gas rose significantly to 79 million tonnes in 2000 from 78 million tonnes in 1996. 77 million tonnes energy produce by oil in 1990. Then, it was 78 and 79 million tonnes in 1996 and 2000 respectively. The power generated by coal 35 million tonnes in 1990. After that, it rose to 50 million tonnes in 1996 but in 2000, it declined by 34 million tonnes. 20 million tonne energy generated by nuclear power it increased 30 million tonne in 1996. After 30 million tonnes increased and dropped 25 million tonne in 2000. The energy produced by hydropower 0. 3 million tonnes in 1990. However, it rose 0. 4 and 0. 6 million tonnes in 1996 and 2000 respectively. Overall, it is evident that, the generated by natural gas, oil and hydropower continues increased in given years and nuclear power and coal decline.
The provided table chart depicts, the information about the comparison of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
production by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
natural
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gas
, oil coal, nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
and hydropower during time period in 1990, 1996 and 2000 in UK.

In 1990,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
production by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
natural
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gas
was 76
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
production by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
natural
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gas
rose
significantly
to 79
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes in 2000 from 78
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes in 1996. 77
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
produce by oil in 1990. Then, it was 78 and 79
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes in 1996 and 2000
respectively
.

The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
generated by coal 35
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes in 1990. After that, it rose to 50
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes in 1996
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
in 2000, it declined by 34
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes. 20
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonne
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
generated by nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
it increased 30
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: "tonnes".
tonne
in 1996. After 30
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes increased and dropped 25
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: "tonnes".
tonne
in 2000. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
produced by hydropower 0. 3
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes in 1990.
However
, it rose 0. 4 and 0. 6
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes in 1996 and 2000
respectively
.

Overall
, it is evident that, the generated by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
natural
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gas
, oil and hydropower continues increased in
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
years and nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
and coal decline.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The table compares the energy production by different source in UK

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
191 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts