The table below shows us the quantity of exports being pass through Rotterdam port, between 2002 and 2012, and the amount of tax imposed on the goods at global destinations.
It is clear that, total exports increased slightly reach to 18600 million times in 2012. Despite the 'total' most of the destinations dropped in volume. For example, Europe the largest zone went down from 6900 million to 6400 million and the USA the second highest dreased to 4200 million to 3900 million. China dipped slightly to 2300 million and the Latin America fell to 1500. The “other” destinations are levelled off at 350 million. By contrast, Asia Pacific and Australia claimed to 2550 and 2300 receptively.
Turning to taxation, we can clearly see that tax increased in all destinations that showed a decline in volumes, reach to 2% in the USA, China and Latin America, and in Europe it rose from 5% to 8%. The “other” zones unchanged at 2 % while the Asia Pacific and Australia reduced massively, from 5% to 2% and 4% to 1%.
The table below
shows
us the quantity of exports being pass through Rotterdam port, between 2002 and 2012, and the amount of tax imposed on the
goods
at global destinations.
It is
clear
that, total exports increased
slightly
reach to 18600
million
times in 2012. Despite the 'total' most of the destinations dropped in volume.
For example
, Europe the largest zone went down from 6900
million
to 6400
million
and the USA the second highest
dreased
to 4200
million
to 3900
million
. China dipped
slightly
to 2300
million
and the Latin America fell to 1500. The “other” destinations
are levelled
off at 350
million
. By contrast, Asia Pacific and Australia claimed to 2550 and 2300
receptively
.
Turning to taxation, we can
clearly
see
that tax increased in all destinations that
showed
a decline in volumes, reach to 2% in the USA, China and Latin America, and in Europe it rose from 5% to 8%. The “other” zones unchanged at 2 % while the Asia Pacific and Australia
reduced
massively
, from 5% to 2% and 4% to 1%.