THE GIVEN TABLE ILLUSTRATES THE NUMBER AND PROPORTION OF VARIOUS TYPES OF UNDERPRIVILEGED FAMILIES OF AUSTRALIA IN 1999. ACCORDING TO THE OVERALL SURVEY, APPROXIMATELY ONE-TENTH OF THE POPULATION OF AUSTRALIA WERE IMPOVERISHED THAT WAS 11%, WHILE LEAST PROPORTION OF AGED PEOPLE SUFFERED FROM POVERTY THAT WAS AROUND 4% TO 6%. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PEOPLE FROM SINGLE FAMILY TYPE WITHOUT CHILDREN AND SOLE PARENTS WERE DEPRIVED OF MONEY THAT WAS 19% AND 21%. REFERRING TO THE DATA OF THE CHART 12% OF POOR FAMILIES BELONGED TO COUPLES WITH THEIR CHILDREN. BESIDES, 19% OF THE POPULATION WERE POVERTY STRICKEN CATAGORISED UNDER SINGLE WITHOUT KIDS FAMILY TYPE. IN CONCLUSION, SINGLE PARENTS HAD TO FACE SIGNIFICANT POVERTY ISSUES COMPARED TO THE ELDERLY COUPLES.
THE
GIVEN
TABLE ILLUSTRATES THE NUMBER AND PROPORTION OF VARIOUS TYPES OF UNDERPRIVILEGED
FAMILIES
OF AUSTRALIA IN 1999. ACCORDING TO THE
OVERALL
SURVEY, APPROXIMATELY ONE-TENTH OF THE POPULATION OF AUSTRALIA
WERE IMPOVERISHED
THAT WAS 11%, WHILE LEAST PROPORTION OF AGED
PEOPLE
SUFFERED FROM POVERTY THAT WAS AROUND 4% TO 6%. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF
PEOPLE
FROM SINGLE
FAMILY
TYPE WITHOUT CHILDREN AND SOLE PARENTS
WERE DEPRIVED
OF MONEY THAT WAS 19% AND 21%. REFERRING TO THE DATA OF THE CHART 12% OF POOR
FAMILIES
BELONGED TO COUPLES WITH THEIR CHILDREN.
BESIDES
, 19% OF THE POPULATION WERE POVERTY STRICKEN
CATAGORISED
UNDER SINGLE WITHOUT KIDS
FAMILY
TYPE.
IN CONCLUSION
, SINGLE PARENTS HAD TO FACE SIGNIFICANT POVERTY ISSUES COMPARED TO THE ELDERLY COUPLES.