The provided graph gives information about the proportion of young undergraduates in 4 various nations, in the period from 2000 to 2010.
Overall, country A and D underwent a steady upward trend during studied time while the figure of two remaining brackets were almost unvolatile. It is also obviously seen that the percentage of people attending tertiary education in country D was the highest when compared with other sectors.
In 2000, there was roughly 2 fifths of undergraduates in country A. The figure is accompanied by an increase to about 10% before reaching its peak of 58% in the year of 2010. A similar pattern can be observed in country D although its university attending rate was considerably higher than that in country A, at 60%. Ten years later, there was a marked rocket by 20% in the proportion of undergraduates which followed a slight climb to approximately 63% in 2005.
Moving to the other 2 countries, it can be easily witnessed that both of their figure didn’t experience lots of change, fluctuating around 40% for country B and 52% for country C. However, there was a clear difference between the proportion of young people in higher education in 2 countries which reveals that the undergraduate rate of country B was the lowest during the researched time, with a gap of more than 10% in comparison with country C.
The provided graph gives information about the proportion of young
undergraduates
in 4 various nations, in the period from 2000 to 2010.
Overall
,
country
A and D underwent a steady upward trend during studied time while the figure of two remaining brackets were almost
unvolatile
. It is
also
obviously
seen
that the percentage of
people
attending tertiary education in
country
D was the highest when compared with other sectors.
In 2000, there was roughly 2 fifths of
undergraduates
in
country
A. The figure
is accompanied
by an increase to about 10%
before
reaching its peak of 58% in the year of 2010. A similar pattern can
be observed
in
country
D although its university attending rate was
considerably
higher than that in
country
A, at 60%. Ten years later, there was a marked rocket by 20% in the proportion of
undergraduates
which followed a slight climb to approximately 63% in 2005.
Moving to the other 2
countries
, it can be
easily
witnessed that both of their figure didn’t experience lots of
change
, fluctuating around 40% for
country
B and 52% for
country
C.
However
, there was a
clear
difference between the proportion of young
people
in higher education in 2
countries
which reveals that the
undergraduate
rate of
country
B was the lowest during the researched time, with a gap of more than 10%
in comparison
with
country
C.