Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The pie charts compare proportions of energy which was produced from different sources in two separated years (1995 and 2005) in one European country (France).

The pie charts compare proportions of energy which was produced from different sources in two separated years (1995 and 2005) in one European country (France). MyBnQ
The pie charts compare proportions of energy which was produced from different sources in two separated years (1995 and 2005) in one European country (France). Overall, coal and gas produced the most part of all energy in France, while other sources produced the least energy in both years. There was a sharp decrease in production from petro, whereas an increase of nuclear and other energy can be seen in the figures. The amount of energy produced from gas and coal showed a slight increase and constituted slightly above 59% in 1995 and 61% in 2005. These types of sources produced the vast majority of energy in these years. The energy from petro which was the second source of energy in 1995 (about 29%) has dropped by slightly below 20% in 2005. On the other hand, the amount of nuclear and other energy has increased sharply less than double from 11% totally to slightly below 20%
The pie charts compare proportions of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
which was
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
produced
from
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
in two separated years (1995 and 2005) in one European country (France).

Overall
, coal and gas
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
produced
the most part of all
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
in France, while
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
produced
the least
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
in both years. There was a sharp decrease in production from
Possible spelling mistake found.
petro
, whereas an increase of nuclear and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
in the figures.

The amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
produced
from gas and coal
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
showed
a slight increase and constituted
slightly
above 59% in 1995 and 61% in 2005. These types of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
produced
the vast majority of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
in these years.

The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
from
Possible spelling mistake found.
petro
which was the second
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
source
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
in 1995 (about 29%) has dropped by
slightly
below 20% in 2005. On the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
hand, the amount of nuclear and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
has increased
sharply
less than double from 11%
totally
to
slightly
below 20%
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The pie charts compare proportions of energy which was produced from different sources in two separated years (1995 and 2005) in one European country (France).

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
154 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts