Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. d86K
The given pie charts show electricity production in France and Australia through different sources. This data is given for the years 1980 and 2000. Overall, the production of electricity through coal was highest in Australia while Nuclear Power was the highest source of electricity generation in France. Individually, the use of coal and hydropower increased in Australia while the rest decreased. On the other hand, Oil and Nuclear power showed an increase in France by the end of the given period. Let us first talk about the electricity production in Australia. Coal was the largest producer of electricity in both the years. In 1980, coal produced about 50 units of electricity which climbed to 130 units in 2000. Initially, 20 units of electricity were manufactured by using Hydropower. This figure increased by 16 units in 2000. At the start of the period, Oil and Natural Gas contributed 20 and 10 units respectively to the electricity production and both these fuel sources dropped to two units at the end of the given time. In 1980, Nuclear Power produced just 15 units of electricity in France. This number increased by more than eight times the initial value. At first, Oil produced 20 units of electricity which noted a growth of five units in 2000. In 1980, Natural gas and Hydropower generated 25 and 5 units of electricity respectively, both of which reduced to produce only 2 units each after 20 years. The production of electricity through coal remained the same in both the years (25 units).
The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
pie charts
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
show
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electricity
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
in France and Australia through
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
sources. This data is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
for the years 1980 and 2000.

Overall
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electricity
through coal was highest in Australia while Nuclear Power was the highest source of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electricity
generation in France.
Individually
, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of coal and hydropower increased in Australia while the rest decreased.
On the other hand
, Oil and Nuclear power
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
showed
an increase in France by the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
of the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
period.

This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Let
us
first
talk about the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electricity
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
in Australia. Coal was the largest producer of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electricity
in both the years. In 1980, coal produced about 50
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electricity
which climbed to 130
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
in 2000.
Initially
, 20
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electricity
were manufactured
by using Hydropower. This figure increased by 16
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
in 2000. At the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
start
of the period, Oil and Natural Gas contributed 20 and 10
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
respectively
to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electricity
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
and both these fuel sources dropped to two
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
at the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
of the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
time.

In 1980, Nuclear Power produced
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
15
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electricity
in France. This number increased by more than eight times the initial value. At
first
, Oil produced 20
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electricity
which noted a growth of five
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
in 2000. In 1980, Natural gas and Hydropower generated 25 and 5
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electricity
respectively
, both of which
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduced
to produce
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
2
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
each after 20 years. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electricity
through coal remained the same in both the years (25
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units)
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
254 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts