Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.

The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. BJgNa
The charts give information about comparison of electricity production by fuel source between Australia and France in two different years 1980 and 2000. The production of electricity increased by nearly twice rising from 100 units to 170 in Australia, and from 90 to 180 units in France. In the 1980s, coal was used as the main source of energy in Australia. In addition, oil, natural gas and hydro power were used. In 1980, the use of coal was 50%, but in 2000 it was more than 75%. In addition, hydro power and other energy resources accounted for about 20% of production. In contrast, in 1980, France used 25 units of coal and natural gas. The remaining blocks consisted of oil, nuclear power and hydro power. However, nuclear energy, which is not used in Australia, becomes the main source and accounts for about 75% (126 units) of electricity. While coal and oil together produced only 50 units and other sources were no longer important. In conclusion, until 2000, the two countries used different primary fuel sources: Australia used on coal and France on nuclear power.
The charts give information about comparison of electricity production by fuel
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
source
between Australia and France in two
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
years 1980 and 2000. The production of electricity increased by
nearly
twice rising from 100
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
to 170 in Australia, and from 90 to 180
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
in France.

In the 1980s, coal was
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
as the main
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
source
of energy in Australia.
In addition
, oil, natural gas and hydro
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
were
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
.
Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
In
1980, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of coal was 50%,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
in 2000 it was more than 75%.
Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
In
addition, hydro
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
and other energy resources accounted for about 20% of production.

Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
In
contrast, in 1980, France
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
25
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
of coal and natural gas. The remaining blocks consisted of oil, nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
and hydro
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
.
However
, nuclear energy, which is not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
in Australia, becomes the main
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
source
and accounts for about 75% (126
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units)
of electricity. While coal and oil together produced
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
50
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
and other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
were no longer
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
.

In conclusion
, until 2000, the two countries
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
primary fuel
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
: Australia
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
on coal and France on nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
184 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.