Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.

The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. w9Ym

The mentioned two pie charts illustrate the proportion of various kinds of energy generation of France in two different years 1995 and 2005. Overall, it is clear from the charts that there is a great proportion of coal used for energy production in both the years. In contrast, there is relatively less proportion of other sources of energy in both the years. In the year 1995, coal accounted for 29. 80% of the total energy generated which is expected to increase slightly by 1. 13% in 2005. Even though, other source of energy in 1995 accounted for 4. 90% whereas it increases steadily up to 9. 10% by the year 2005. In 2005, both gas as well as petro had a figure of approximately 29% each and it is expected that the former will rise by 0. 68% in 2005 while a drop of 9. 72% is estimated for the latter. In addition to this Nuclear energy is expected to increase by 3. 7% in 2005 from a count of 6. 40% in 1995.

The mentioned two pie charts illustrate the proportion of various kinds of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 generation of France in two This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
 years 1995 and 2005.

Overall
, it is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
 from the charts that there is a great proportion of coal This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 production in both the years. In contrast
, there is relatively
 less proportion of other sources of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 in both the years.

In the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withperiodbreadthtermmileagespandiameter
year
 1995, coal accounted for 29. 80% of the total You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 generated which is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :anticipated
expected
 to increase slightly
 by 1. 13% in 2005. Even though
, other source of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 in 1995 accounted for 4. 90% whereas it increases steadily
 up to 9. 10% by the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withperiodbreadthtermmileagespandiameter
year
 2005.

In 2005, both gas Probable usage error. Use "and" after 'both'.and
as well as
Possible spelling mistake found.metroPedroretroPetrapetrolPietro
petro
 had a figure of approximately 29% each and it is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :anticipated
expected
 that the former will rise by 0. 68% in 2005 while a drop of 9. 72% is estimated
 for the latter. In addition
 to this Nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :anticipated
expected
 to increase by 3. 7% in 2005 from a count of 6. 40% in 1995. 