Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

the pie chart show the electricity generated in Germany and france from all sources and renewables in the year 2009.

the pie chart show the electricity generated in Germany and france from all sources and renewables in the year 2009. bJkX

The pie charts provide a breakdown of the various sources of conventional and renewable energy sources that were exploited in Germany and France in the year 2009. A broad assessment of the charts reveals that there were major differences in electricity production in France and Germany in terms of all types of power and in the specific area of renewables. In both countries, renewables only constituted a small part of total energy production, with figures of 17. 4% in Germany and an even lower 13. 7% in France. In Germany, the majority of power came from conventional thermal sources, while in the France just over three-quarters of all electricity was generated from nuclear. Conversely, approximately a quarter of German electricity came from nuclear and about one-tenth of French power came from conventional thermal generation plants. With respect to renewables, Germany relied on biomass (39. 3%) and wind (36. 9%) for more than 75% of its renewable power, whereas France only acquired 10. 5% of its renewable total from this and even less from biomass (8. 1%). In fact, the bulk of France’s renewable energy came from hydroelectric at just over 80%, with solar contributing with a meager 0. 9%. Germany also produced a minimal amount of solar energy (6. 1%) albeit still significantly higher than France, while its hydroelectric production was dramatically lower at 17. 7%. A final point to note is that neither country produced any power from geothermal sources.

The pie charts provide a breakdown of the various You use this word too often, consider replacing it withorigincauseauthorityexpert
sources
 of conventional and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinexhaustiblesustainable
renewable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withorigincauseauthorityexpert
sources
 that were exploited
 in Germany and France in the year 2009.

A broad assessment of the charts reveals that there were major differences in electricity production in France and Germany in terms of all types of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
 and in the specific area of renewables.

In both countries, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinexhaustiblesustainable
renewables
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 constituted a This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:tiny
small
 part of total You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 production, with figures of 17. 4% in Germany and an even lower 13. 7% in France. In Germany, the majority of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmaterializehitappeargetmovereach
came
 from conventional thermal You use this word too often, consider replacing it withorigincauseauthorityexpert
sources
, while in the France This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 over three-quarters of all electricity was generated
 from nuclear. Conversely
, approximately a quarter of German electricity You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmaterializehitappeargetmovereach
came
 from nuclear and about one-tenth of French You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmaterializehitappeargetmovereach
came
 from conventional thermal generation plants.

With respect to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinexhaustiblesustainable
renewables
, Germany relied on biomass (39. 3%) and wind (36. 9%) for more than 75% of its You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinexhaustiblesustainable
renewable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
, whereas France This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 acquired 10. 5% of its You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinexhaustiblesustainable
renewable
 total from this and even less from biomass (8. 1%). In fact, the bulk of France’s You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinexhaustiblesustainable
renewable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmaterializehitappeargetmovereach
came
 from hydroelectric at This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 over 80%, with solar contributing with a meager 0. 9%. Germany also
 produced a minimal amount of solar You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 (6. 1%) albeit still
significantly
 higher than France, while its hydroelectric production was dramatically
 lower at 17. 7%. A final point to note is that neither country produced any You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
 from geothermal You use this word too often, consider replacing it withorigincauseauthorityexpert
sources
. 