The line graph illustrates the numerical value of international conferences in three cities in the span of 50 years. Overall the graph shows a significant decrease of the number of conferences in cities A and B respectively. On the contrary, a remarkable rise in the count of international meetings can be seen in city C over a given period of time. Between 1965 and 1975, a downward trend in the number of international meetings from 35 to 20 is visible in City A. Similarly, City B experiences a slight dip in the count of conferences from 31 to 28. On the other hand, there is a havoc increment in the count of foreign meetings in City C from 0 to 26 within a span of 30 years. In the following 40 years, a huge drift in the numerical value of conferences is displayed by City A and finally reaches to 20. City B portrays a slight drift in the next 40 years and reaches to 25. From 1995 to 2010, City C faces a little decrement but manages to level up to 30.
The line graph illustrates the numerical value of international
conferences
in three
cities
in the span of 50 years.
Overall
the graph
shows
a significant decrease of the number of
conferences
in
cities
A and B
respectively
.
On the contrary
, a remarkable rise in the count of international meetings can be
seen
in city C over a
given
period of time. Between 1965 and 1975, a downward trend in the number of international meetings from 35 to 20 is visible in City A.
Similarly
, City B experiences a slight dip in the count of
conferences
from 31 to 28.
On the other hand
, there is a havoc increment in the count of foreign meetings in City C from 0 to 26 within a span of 30 years. In the following 40 years, a huge drift in the numerical value of
conferences
is displayed
by City A and
finally
reaches to 20. City B portrays a slight drift in the
next
40 years and reaches to 25. From 1995 to 2010, City C faces a
little
decrement
but
manages to level up to 30.