Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

The maps compare two underground systems for cars in two Australian cities.

The maps compare two underground systems for cars in two Australian cities. PgWwK

The maps compare two underground systems for cars in two Australian cities. One was built from 1986 to 1998, while the other one was constructed between 2002 and 2006. Overall, people invested 555 million dollars in building the first tunnel, compared to 1. 1 billion dollars for the second one. Therefore, the first tunnel had smaller measures for the height, length, and space compared to the second one. Looking at the details, there were significant differences. The first tunnel was located under the bridge, and there was a layer of sand and water above it. Meanwhile, the second one was under the main road, and there was a stone and clay layer on it. As can be seen, the first tunnel had a small space for cars, compared to the other one. To be more specific, there were four road lanes in the first tunnel and six road lanes in the second. Also, the first tunnel had a shorter length (1. 5 meters) than the second one (2. 5 meters). Finally, the depth from the surface to the bottom of the second tunnel was shorter than the first one with 1. 5 and 2. 5 respectively.

The maps compare two underground systems for cars in two Australian cities. One was built
 from 1986 to 1998, while the other one was constructed
 between 2002 and 2006.

Overall
, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 invested 555 million dollars in building the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearly
first
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withshaftminesubwayholepitchannel
tunnel
, compared to 1. 1 billion dollars for the second one. Therefore
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearly
first
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withshaftminesubwayholepitchannel
tunnel
 had smaller measures for the height, length, and space compared to the second one.

Looking at the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :particulars
details
, there were significant differences. The You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearly
first
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withshaftminesubwayholepitchannel
tunnel
was located
 under the bridge, and there was a layer of sand and water above it. Meanwhile, the second one was under the main road, and there was a stone and clay layer on it.

As can be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witnessed
seen
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearly
first
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withshaftminesubwayholepitchannel
tunnel
 had a This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:tiny
small
 space for cars, compared to the other one. To be more specific, there were four road lanes in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearly
first
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withshaftminesubwayholepitchannel
tunnel
 and six road lanes in the second. Also
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearly
first
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withshaftminesubwayholepitchannel
tunnel
 had a shorter length (1. 5 meters) than the second one (2. 5 meters). Finally
, the depth from the surface to the bottom of the second You use this word too often, consider replacing it withshaftminesubwayholepitchannel
tunnel
 was shorter than the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearly
first
 one with 1. 5 and 2. 5 respectively
. 