The pie charts illustrate the various kind of traffic methods of traveller to university where they do work or study between 2004 and 2009.
Overall, it can be seen that a significant ratio in bus were used by traveller, the opposite was true for train. Another notable feature is that car had faster plunge than the years before.
Look at the diverse of methods people used, we can see that in 2004, 51% of the traveller used cars, while the figures for bicycle and bus were lower, at 9% and 33% respectively. Additionally, just 5% of people travelling by walking and train was the method with the lowest percentage of travellers ( 3%).
Turning to 2009, bus attracted the majority of users with 46%, which was 3 times than bicycle. Walking and train were slight increases in the proportion of travellers of 6% and 4% respectively. However, car was a exception. The data was a plummet at 28% in the ratio of people used, which decreased roughly double than 2004.
The pie charts illustrate the various kind of traffic methods of
traveller
to university where they do work or study between 2004 and 2009.
Overall
, it can be
seen
that a significant ratio in bus were
used
by
traveller
, the opposite was true for train. Another notable feature is that car had faster
plunge
than the years
before
.
Look at
the diverse of
methods
people
used
, we can
see
that in 2004, 51% of the
traveller
used
cars, while the figures for bicycle and bus were lower, at 9% and 33%
respectively
.
Additionally
,
just
5% of
people
travelling by walking and train was the method with the lowest percentage of
travellers
(
3%).
Turning to 2009, bus attracted the majority of users with 46%, which was 3
times
than bicycle. Walking and train were slight increases in the proportion of
travellers
of 6% and 4%
respectively
.
However
, car was
a
exception. The data was a plummet at 28% in the ratio of
people
used
, which decreased roughly
double
than 2004.