The pie charts illustrate the various kind of traffic methods of traveller to university where they do work or study between 2004 and 2009.
Overall, it can be seen that a significant ratio in bus were used by traveler, the opposite was true for train. Another notable feature is that car had faster plunged than the years before.
Look at the diverse methods people used, we can see that in 2004, 51% of the traveler used cars, while the figures for bicycle and bus were lower, at 9% and 33% respectively. Additionally, just 5% of people travelling by walking and train was the method with the lowest percentage of travelers ( 3%).
Turning to 2009, bus attracted the majority of users with 46%, which was three times than bicycle. Walking and train were slight increases in the proportion of travelers of 6% and 4% respectively. However, car was a exception. The data was a plummet at 28% in the ratio of people used, which decreased roughly two times than 2004.
The pie charts illustrate the various kind of traffic methods of
traveller
to university where they do work or study between 2004 and 2009.
Overall
, it can be
seen
that a significant ratio in bus were
used
by
traveler
, the opposite was true for train. Another notable feature is that car had faster plunged than the years
before
.
Look at the diverse methods
people
used
, we can
see
that in 2004, 51% of the
traveler
used
cars, while the figures for bicycle and bus were lower, at 9% and 33%
respectively
.
Additionally
,
just
5% of
people
travelling by walking and train was the method with the lowest percentage of
travelers
(
3%).
Turning to 2009, bus attracted the majority of users with 46%, which was three
times
than bicycle. Walking and train were slight increases in the proportion of
travelers
of 6% and 4%
respectively
.
However
, car was
a
exception. The data was a plummet at 28% in the ratio of
people
used
, which decreased roughly two
times
than 2004.