Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The line graph shows the number of bananas important to four nations between 1996 and 2004.

The line graph shows the number of bananas important to four nations between 1996 and 2004. q5Ykr
The ostensible line graph depicts the information about the entire figure of bananas which was imported to Japan, France, Germany and USA over the period of 9 years from 1996 to 2004. Having a clear glance, it can be seen that precisely, 2 USD per kg bananas were imported by Japan and France in 1996. After that, upward trend was experienced by Japan in which imported number of bananas was uplifted by 1 USD per kg (3 USD per kg) during 1998, however France was remained steady with intial number of bananas from 1996 to 1998. whereas, from 1999 zigzag pattern was witnessed by Japan between 2 and 2. 5 USD per kg but after plummeting once in 2003, it was reached at its beginning point in 2004. Varied fluctuation was also faced by France from 1996 to 2002 on the contrary finally, it was steady with 2 USD per kg orderly. Breaking that down, it is further observed that for Germany just 1. 5 USD per kg bananas were accounted in 1996, in contrast before reaching its zenith point in 1998 with over 2. 5 USD per kg imported bananas, it's figure was decreasing slightly in 1997. After, sudden increase in imported number of bananas, it came back as 1997 (1. 5 USD per kg) whilst, imported figure of bananas was increased to Germany from 1999 to 2002 with 2 USD per kg but it dropped slightly in the ending twice years. While, 1 USD per kg bananas were imported by USA respectively in 1986 and 1997 but throughout the years minor upward and downward trend was faced by it under 1 USD per kg. Looking from an overall perspective, it can be readily apparent that most of the bananas were imported by Japan and Germany except remaining nationas.
The ostensible line graph depicts the information about the entire figure of bananas which was
imported
to
Japan
, France, Germany and USA over the period of 9 years from 1996 to 2004. Having a
clear
glance, it can be
seen
that
precisely
, 2 USD per kg bananas were
imported
by
Japan
and France in 1996. After that, upward trend
was experienced
by
Japan
in which
imported
number of bananas
was uplifted
by 1 USD per kg (3 USD per kg) during 1998,
however
France
was remained
steady with
intial
number of bananas from 1996 to 1998.
whereas
, from 1999 zigzag pattern
was witnessed
by
Japan
between 2 and 2. 5 USD per kg
but
after plummeting once in 2003, it
was reached
at its beginning point in 2004. Varied fluctuation was
also
faced by France from 1996 to 2002
on the contrary
finally
, it was steady with 2 USD per kg orderly. Breaking that down, it is
further
observed that for Germany
just
1. 5 USD per kg bananas
were accounted
in 1996,
in contrast
before
reaching its zenith point in 1998 with over 2. 5 USD per kg
imported
bananas, it's figure was decreasing
slightly
in 1997. After, sudden increase in
imported
number of bananas, it came back as 1997 (1. 5 USD per kg) whilst,
imported
figure of bananas
was increased
to Germany from 1999 to 2002 with 2 USD per kg
but
it dropped
slightly
in the ending twice years. While, 1 USD per kg bananas were
imported
by USA
respectively
in 1986 and 1997
but
throughout the years minor upward and downward trend
was faced
by it under 1 USD per kg. Looking from an
overall
perspective, it can be
readily
apparent that most of the bananas were
imported
by
Japan
and Germany except remaining
nationas
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The line graph shows the number of bananas important to four nations between 1996 and 2004.

Academic
  American English
1 paragraphs
300 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: