Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The line graph shows burglaries per thousands in four countries between 2000 and 2009.

The line graph shows burglaries per thousands in four countries between 2000 and 2009. PoGE
The graph illustrates comparative statistics on the number of burglaries in four countries (Great Britain, Greece, Spain and Norway) over a 10-year period (2000-2009). The units of thefts were measured in thousands. Overall, the highest recurrence of burglary was in Great Britain, which was fairly high from 2000-2009 in comparison to the other countries, while the lowest incidence when the study began in 2000 was in Spain. It can be seen that in 2009 Spain reported slightly lower figures than the other four countries. The graph shows that Great Britain’s burglaries were consistently high, never below the 20, 000 mark, though the trend fluctuates over the 10-year period. According to the data, the country experienced the highest number of thefts during 2002 (20, 000) and 2006 (20, 000). However, it experienced its lowest amount stolen in 2009 at approximately 15, 000. Similarly, Spain experienced fluctuating trends, on the contrary on the opposite side of the spectrum as it reported the least amount of burglaries in 2000 (6, 000) with frequency varying over the years and finally reporting a decline in 2009 (4, 000). However, other notable statistics are Greece’s upward trend in the number of burglaries, which started in 2000 (8, 000) and finally peaked at 14, 000 during 2009. Norway is also noteworthy for having considerably low thefts over the course of 10 years compared to the other countries, dropping sharply in 2003, on the contrary increasing slightly from there, finally peaking at 6, 000 slightly higher than Spain.
The graph illustrates comparative statistics on the number of
burglaries
in four
countries
(Great Britain, Greece, Spain and Norway)
over
a
10-year
period (2000-2009). The units of thefts
were measured
in thousands.

Overall
, the highest recurrence of
burglary
was in Great Britain, which was
fairly
high from 2000-2009
in comparison
to the
other
countries
, while the lowest incidence when the study began in 2000 was in Spain. It can be
seen
that in 2009 Spain reported
slightly
lower figures than the
other
four countries.

The graph
shows
that Great Britain’s
burglaries
were
consistently
high, never below the 20, 000 mark, though the trend fluctuates
over
the
10-year
period. According to the data, the
country
experienced the highest number of thefts during 2002 (20, 000) and 2006 (20, 000).
However
, it experienced its lowest amount stolen in 2009 at approximately 15, 000.

Similarly
, Spain experienced fluctuating trends,
on the contrary
on the opposite side of the spectrum as it reported the least amount of
burglaries
in 2000 (6, 000) with frequency varying
over
the years and
finally
reporting a decline in 2009 (4, 000).
However
,
other
notable statistics are Greece’s upward trend in the number of
burglaries
, which
started
in 2000 (8, 000) and
finally
peaked at 14, 000 during 2009. Norway is
also
noteworthy for having
considerably
low thefts
over
the course of 10 years compared to the
other
countries
, dropping
sharply
in 2003,
on the contrary
increasing
slightly
from there,
finally
peaking at 6, 000
slightly
higher than Spain.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The line graph shows burglaries per thousands in four countries between 2000 and 2009.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
250 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: