Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The line graph illustrates the average emissions of carbon dioxide per person in four European countries over a 40-year period.

The line graph illustrates the average emissions of carbon dioxide per person in four European countries over a 40-year period. Overall, it is clear that the emissions in the UK and Sweden showed a downward trend while the figures for Italy and Portugal saw a remarkable increase. The most striking feature is that people in the UK produced the largest amount of carbon dioxide in 1967, at about 11 metric tonnes. By stark contrast, Portuguese residents had the least proportion of carbon emissions with approximately 0. 6 metric tonnes in the first year. However, the figures for Portugal then experienced a sharp rise, going up to roughly 5. 5 metric tonnes in 2007. Over the next decades, the amount of carbon dioxide in the UK decreased steadily by 2 metric tonnes. With regard to Sweden and Italy, it is noticeable that the amount of CO2 emissions of Swedish residents was almost two times higher than that of Italians, at about 8. 8 and 4. 5 respectively. The figures for Sweden then soared to reach its peak at 10. 3 metric tonnes before decreasing steeply in the next years. Conversely, the emissions per person in Italy saw a steady increase to 7. 8 metric tonnes in 2007.
The line graph illustrates the average
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emissions
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
carbon
dioxide per person in four European countries over a 40-year period.
Overall
, it is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emissions
in the UK and Sweden
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
showed
a downward trend while the figures for Italy and Portugal
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
saw
a remarkable increase.

The most striking feature is that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
in the UK produced the largest amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
carbon
dioxide in 1967, at about 11 metric tonnes. By stark contrast, Portuguese residents had the least proportion of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
carbon
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emissions
with approximately 0. 6 metric tonnes in the
first
year.
However
, the figures for Portugal then experienced a sharp rise, going up to roughly 5. 5 metric tonnes in 2007. Over the
next
decades, the amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
carbon
dioxide in the UK decreased
steadily
by 2 metric tonnes.

With regard to Sweden and Italy, it is noticeable that the amount of CO2
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emissions
of Swedish residents was almost two times higher than that of Italians, at about 8. 8 and 4. 5
respectively
. The figures for Sweden then soared to reach its peak at 10. 3 metric tonnes
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
decreasing
steeply
in the
next
years.
Conversely
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emissions
per person in Italy
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
saw
a steady increase to 7. 8 metric tonnes in 2007.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The line graph illustrates the average emissions of carbon dioxide per person in four European countries over a 40-year period.

Academic
  American English
3 paragraphs
206 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts