Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The line graph elucidates the information about the car thefts in the four countries like Great Britain, Sweden, France and Canada from 1990 to 1999.

The line graph elucidates the information about the car thefts in the four countries like Great Britain, Sweden, France and Canada from 1990 to 1999. oELbK
The line graph elucidates the information about the car thefts in the four countries like Great Britain, Sweden, France and Canada from 1990 to 1999. The unit is theft per thousand vehicles. To summarise, the number of people who lost their cars in Sweden increased, whereas, in Great Britain, Canada, and France, it decreased as years passed. In the year 1990, more than 15 thefts had taken place in Great Britain. It was fluctuating in the entire period. It had peaked in the year 1996 at 20 per 1000 vehicles. By the end of the period, it had reduced to somewhere around 16 thefts per year. Whereas, in 1990 there were less than 10 thefts per 1000 in Sweden. After that, it was stagnant for a few years. In the year 1995, it had increased to more than 10 per 1000. Hereafter it was steady for three years. Again, it had augmented in no. of thefts which reached somewhere around 15 per 1000. On the other hand, in Canada, more than 5 thefts per 1000 had taken place in 1990. It had reduced as years passed. By the year 1993, it fell and became steady (5 per 1000). From the year 1993 to 1999, it had gradual change. Likewise, in 1999, there were 5 per 1000 thefts in France. it had to vary in the entire period. By the end of the period, the number of thefts per thousand vehicles in Canada and France was roughly the same.
The line graph elucidates the information about the car
thefts
in the four countries like Great Britain, Sweden, France and Canada from 1990 to 1999. The unit is
theft
per thousand vehicles.

To
summarise
, the number of
people
who lost their cars in Sweden increased, whereas, in Great Britain, Canada, and France, it decreased as years passed.

In the
year
1990, more than 15
thefts
had taken place in Great Britain. It was fluctuating in the entire
period
. It had peaked in the
year
1996 at 20 per 1000 vehicles. By the
end
of the
period
, it had
reduced
to somewhere around 16
thefts
per
year
.
Whereas
, in 1990 there were less than 10
thefts
per 1000 in Sweden. After that, it was stagnant for a few years. In the
year
1995, it had increased to more than 10 per 1000. Hereafter it was steady for three years. Again, it had augmented in no. of
thefts
which reached somewhere around 15 per 1000.

On the other hand
, in Canada, more than 5
thefts
per 1000 had taken place in 1990. It had
reduced
as years passed. By the
year
1993, it fell and became steady (5 per 1000). From the
year
1993 to 1999, it had gradual
change
.
Likewise
, in 1999, there were 5 per 1000
thefts
in France.
it
had to vary in the entire
period
. By the
end
of the
period
, the number of
thefts
per thousand vehicles in Canada and France was roughly the same.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The line graph elucidates the information about the car thefts in the four countries like Great Britain, Sweden, France and Canada from 1990 to 1999.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
248 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: