The line graph displays the proportion of test outcomes in England and London from 2001 to 2006.
Overall, London experienced a constant surge throughout the period whereas England oscillated briefy then later witnessed a gradual soar.
To begin with, in the year 2001, London was ranked second after an approximated 46% pass with only 2% difference. Two years later, the fgures increased minimally to around 51%. Thereafter, the displayed figures maintained an upward trajectory throughout the remaining years and emerging victorious ahead of England with nearly 58% in 2006.
In contrast, England commenced the year with almost 47% success rate ahead of Londonn The proportion grew gently to around 51% excellence after two years. However, between 2003 and 2004, England’s academic performance nearly fatened out with almost 52%. Nevertheless, a steady rise was seen during the last two years and unfortunately finishing second with just a percentage gap behind London.
The line graph displays the proportion of
test
outcomes in England and London from 2001 to 2006.
Overall
, London experienced a constant surge throughout the period whereas England oscillated
briefy
then later witnessed a gradual soar.
To
begin
with, in the
year
2001, London
was ranked
second after an approximated 46% pass with
only
2% difference. Two years later, the
fgures
increased
minimally
to around 51%. Thereafter, the displayed figures maintained an upward trajectory throughout the remaining years and emerging victorious ahead of England with
nearly
58% in 2006.
In contrast
, England commenced the
year
with almost 47% success rate ahead of
Londonn
The proportion grew
gently
to around 51% excellence after two years.
However
, between 2003 and 2004, England’s academic performance
nearly
fatened
out with almost 52%.
Nevertheless
, a steady rise was
seen
during the last two years and unfortunately finishing second with
just
a percentage gap behind London.