Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The line graph compares the quantity of waste output by three companies namely company A, company B and company C from 2000 to 2015. In general, the amount of waste pr

The line graph compares the quantity of waste output by three companies namely company A, company B and company C from 2000 to 2015. In general, the amount of waste pr 8dp2w
The line graph compares the quantity of waste output by three companies namely company A, company B and company C from 2000 to 2015. In general, the amount of waste produced in company C tended to increase sharply over a period of 15 years. Meanwhile, the amount of waste output in company A and company B dropped accordingly over the years. In 2000, company A had the highest number of waste material, about 12 tonnes, while that of company B was about 8 tonnes and that of company C was around 4 tonnes. Over the following five years, the amount of waste produced at company B and company C tended to decline/declined rapidly with about 10 tonnes and 6 tonnes, respectively, followed by a slow fall in the number of waste output by company A at/with roughly 11 tonnes. By 2015, the quantity of waste produced in company A is expected to drop to about 8 tonnes, whereas company B is predicted to decline to around 3 tonnes. At the same time, there was a plunge in the amount of waste material by company C with over 9 tonnes.
The line graph compares the quantity of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
output by three
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
namely
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
A,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
B and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
C from 2000 to 2015.
In general
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
amount
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
produced in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
C tended to increase
sharply
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
over
a period of 15 years. Meanwhile, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
amount
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
output in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
A and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
B dropped
accordingly
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
over
the years.

In 2000,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
A had the highest number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
material, about 12 tonnes, while that of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
B was about 8 tonnes and that of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
C was around 4 tonnes.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Over
the following five years, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
amount
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
produced at
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
B and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
C tended to decline/declined
rapidly
with about 10 tonnes and 6 tonnes,
respectively
, followed by a slow fall in the number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
output by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
A at/with roughly 11 tonnes.

By 2015, the quantity of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
produced in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
A is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
expected
to drop to about 8 tonnes, whereas
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
B
is predicted
to decline to around 3 tonnes. At the same time, there was a plunge in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
amount
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
material by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
C with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
over
9 tonnes.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The line graph compares the quantity of waste output by three companies namely company A, company B and company C from 2000 to 2015. In general, the amount of waste pr

Academic
  American English
3 paragraphs
189 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The line graph compares the quantity of waste output by three companies namely company A, company B and company C from 2000 to 2015. In general, the amount of waste pr