Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The line graph compares the percentage of staff members trained by four companies from 2003 to 2006.

The line graph compares the percentage of staff members trained by four companies from 2003 to 2006. d39eK
The line graph compares the percentage of staff members trained by four companies from 2003 to 2006. It is clear that the proportion of staff trained by Company C was by far the highest over the three year period shown. However, a considerable rise can be seen in the percentage of of staff which whose training was provided by Company D with figures eventually surprising surpassing those for workers trained by for Company C trained workers. In 2003, almost 28% of the workers were trained by Company WB, while the figures for those who trained by Company D saw the lowest percentage with only 20%. , a Staff training provided by Company C for workers was about 2% lower than Company B did. Between 2004 and 2006 there was a gradual growth in the percentage of workers who were trained by Company D to around 36%. During the same period the figures for staff training provided by Company A slightly increased reaching a little under 35%, meanwhile the proportion of workers trained by Company C rose with a small fluctuation to 36%. There were no significant changes in the percentage of workers trained by Company B as a whole.
The line graph compares the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
staff
members
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trained
by four
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
from 2003 to 2006. It is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
that the proportion of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
staff
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trained
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Company
C was by far the highest over the
When a number forms part of an adjectival compound, use a hyphen: "three-year"
three year
period shown.
However
, a considerable rise can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
Possible typo: you repeated a word
of of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
staff
which whose training
was provided
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Company
D with figures
eventually
surprising surpassing those for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
workers
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trained
by for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Company
C
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trained
workers.

In 2003, almost 28% of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
workers
were
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trained
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Company
WB, while the figures for those who
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trained
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Company
D
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
saw
the lowest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
with
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
20%.
Loose punctuation mark.
,
a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Staff
training provided by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Company
C for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
workers
was about 2% lower than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Company
B did.

Between 2004 and 2006 there was a gradual growth in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
workers
who were
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trained
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Company
D to around 36%. During the same period the figures for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
staff
training provided by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Company
A
slightly
increased reaching a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
little
under 35%, meanwhile the proportion of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
workers
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trained
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Company
C rose with a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
small
fluctuation to 36%. There were no significant
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
changes
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
workers
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trained
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Company
B as a whole.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The line graph compares the percentage of staff members trained by four companies from 2003 to 2006.

Academic
  American English
3 paragraphs
199 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The line graph compares the percentage of staff members trained by four companies from 2003 to 2006.