Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

The line chart compares the rate of money spent in five types of goods and service in a country in Europe from 1960 to 2000

The line chart compares the rate of money spent in five types of goods and service in a country in Europe from 1960 to 2000 73p5A

The line chart compares the rate of money spent in five types of goods and service in a country in Europe from 1960 to 2000It is clear that there was a considerable increase in the proportion of spending on transport whereas the figures for food, leisure, clothing and fuel significantly declined. Additionally, while the rate for food experienced a dramatic change, the quantity of fuel was far lowest during the research periodIn 1960, the percentage of expenditure on food was highest at just under 35%, while the figure for leisure was significant lower, at around 20%. By the contrast, the money allocated for clothing made up 10%, compared to approximately 9% of transport. The spending on fuel only accounted for about 6% and was lowest in the same period. In the year 2000, the rate of expenditure on transport sustantially rose to about 15%, became the highest figure of five catogories whereas the quantity of food saw a quick decrease at only roughly 14%. The figures for leisure, clothing and fuel gradually fell to about 11%, 5% and 3, 5% respectively

The line chart compares the rate of money spent in five types of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :productscommoditiesmerchandises
goods
 and service in a country in Europe from 1960 to 2000It is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
 that there was a considerable increase in the proportion of spending on transport whereas the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpricecharacterratenumbersymbolamount
figures
 for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
, leisure, clothing and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withelectricityfoodmaterialgasammunition
fuel
significantly
 declined. Additionally
, while the rate for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
 experienced a dramatic This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alteradjust
change
, the quantity of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withelectricityfoodmaterialgasammunition
fuel
 was far lowest during the research Possible spelling mistake found.periodicperiod In
periodIn
 1960, the percentage of expenditure on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
 was highest at This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 under 35%, while the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpricecharacterratenumbersymbolamount
figure
 for leisure was significant lower, at around 20%. By the contrast, the money allocated for clothing made up 10%, compared to approximately 9% of transport. The spending on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withelectricityfoodmaterialgasammunition
fuel
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 accounted for about 6% and was lowest in the same period. In the year 2000, the rate of expenditure on transport Possible spelling mistake found.substantially
sustantially
 rose to about 15%, became the highest You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpricecharacterratenumbersymbolamount
figure
 of five Possible spelling mistake found.categories
catogories
 whereas the quantity of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witnessed
saw
 a quick decrease at This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 roughly 14%. The You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpricecharacterratenumbersymbolamount
figures
 for leisure, clothing and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withelectricityfoodmaterialgasammunition
fuel
gradually
 fell to about 11%, 5% and 3, 5% Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraphrespectively.respectively!respectively?respectively:respectively,respectively;
respectively