Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The graph shows the monthly expenditure on three types of restaurant food in Australia. The plot shows the annual number of restaurant visits for the same types of food between 1965 and 2015.

The graph shows the monthly expenditure on three types of restaurant food in Australia. The plot shows the annual number of restaurant visits for the same types of food between 1965 and 2015. aEBOV
The bar graph shows the expenditure of different income groups in Italian, Indian and Chinese restaurants in Australia, while the scatterplot shows the number of annual visits per person to the same type of restaurants between 1965 and 2015. The proportion of money spent on Chinese and Italian food is similar for high ($42 and $20), medium ($35 and $14) and low ($13 and $8) income groups. As people’s income becomes higher, the proportion of money that is spent on Indian food drops from being the most to least favoured style of food. This suggests that Indian food is preferred because it is the least expensive option. In 1970 the total number of restaurant visits per year was approximately 5 visits per person, which was made up of 3 and 2 visits per person to Chinese and Italian restaurants, respectively. The total remained low until 1985, but after that time increased steadily to around 50 visits per year by 2015. After 1985, the number of visits to Chinese restaurants increased in a continuous upward trend reaching 22 visits per person per year by 2015, while visits to Italian and Indian restaurants initially followed a similar trend but the number of visits began to level out after the year 2000 reaching 15 and 12 visits per person per year by 2015, respectively. People having higher disposable incomes and less free time are probably the causes of the dramatic change in eating habits.
The bar graph
shows
the expenditure of
different
income
groups in Italian,

Indian and Chinese
restaurants
in Australia, while the
scatterplot
shows
the
number
of annual
visits
per
person
to the same type of
restaurants
between 1965 and 2015.

The proportion of money spent on Chinese and Italian
food
is similar for high ($42 and $20), medium ($35 and $14) and low ($13 and $8)
income
groups. As
people
’s
income
becomes higher, the proportion of money that
is spent
on Indian
food
drops from being the most to
least
favoured
style of
food
. This suggests that Indian
food
is preferred
because
it is the least expensive option.

In 1970 the total
number
of
restaurant
visits
per
year
was approximately 5
visits
per
person
, which
was made
up of 3 and 2
visits
per
person
to Chinese and Italian
restaurants
,
respectively
. The total remained low until 1985,
but
after that time increased
steadily
to around 50
visits
per
year
by 2015. After 1985, the
number
of
visits
to Chinese
restaurants
increased in a continuous upward trend reaching 22
visits
per
person
per
year
by 2015, while
visits
to Italian and Indian
restaurants
initially
followed a similar trend
but
the
number
of
visits
began to level out after the
year
2000 reaching 15 and 12
visits
per
person
per
year
by 2015,
respectively
.
People
having higher disposable
incomes
and less free time are
probably
the causes of the dramatic
change
in eating habits.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The graph shows the monthly expenditure on three types of restaurant food in Australia. The plot shows the annual number of restaurant visits for the same types of food between 1965 and 2015.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
241 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: