Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The graph illustrates the details of fluctuation in rate of homes of 5 various cities from the time span of 1990 to 2002 in oppose

The graph illustrates the details of fluctuation in rate of homes of 5 various cities from the time span of 1990 to 2002 in oppose GNw2o
The graph illustrates the details of fluctuation in rate of homes of 5 various cities from the time span of 1990 to 2002 in oppose to the 1989. All units are measured in the percentage Overall, it is clearly evident that in first five years the changes were moreover declining but only two cities property rates were growing whereas, in last six years all property rates were drastically growing except one city. In 1990 to 1995, the price dropped significantly nearly to 7 percent in Tokyo and London whereas New Yorkers faced damage of 5 percent in terms of price drop. However, Madrid city homes price grew nearly 2 percent and Frankfurt city land close to 3 percentage only. On the other hand, 1996 to 2002, London property rates were skyrocketing and nearly touched 12 percent where as New York, Madrid and Frankfurt rates were inclined to 5, 4 and 2 percent respectively. However, Tokyo managed to recover only 2 percentage.
The graph illustrates the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
details
of fluctuation in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rate
of homes of 5 various
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cities
from the time span of 1990 to 2002 in oppose to the 1989. All units
are measured
in the
Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraph
percentage


Overall
, it is
clearly
evident that in
first
five years the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
changes
were
moreover
declining
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
two
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cities
property
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rates
were growing whereas, in last six years all property
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rates
were
drastically
growing except one city.

In 1990 to 1995, the price dropped
significantly
nearly
to 7
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percent
in Tokyo and London whereas New Yorkers faced
The usual collocation for word "damage" is "to" not "of." Revise: "damage to".
damage of
5
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percent
in terms of price drop.
However
, Madrid city homes price grew
nearly
2
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percent
and Frankfurt city land close to 3 percentage
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
.

On the other hand
, 1996 to 2002, London property
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rates
were skyrocketing and
nearly
touched 12
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percent
Did you mean "whereas"?
where as
New York, Madrid and Frankfurt
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rates
were inclined
to 5, 4 and 2
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percent
respectively
.
However
, Tokyo managed to recover
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
2 percentage.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The graph illustrates the details of fluctuation in rate of homes of 5 various cities from the time span of 1990 to 2002 in oppose

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
161 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts