Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart below represents the proportion of four various materials (paper & cardboard, glass container, aluminum cans, plastics) which were recycled in a specific country for 28 years from 1982 to 2010. 

Overall, we could notice from the chart that, paper and cardboard were the most recycled material within the year 1990 to 1994 with an 80 percent ratio. However we could also depict from the same chart that the material with the least percent was plastic which was well under 10 percent in the year 1989, moreover, we could see that all the materials had the highest recycling ratio in 2008 apart from paper and cardboard which experienced a fall. 

With regards to paper and cardboard, the ratio decreased substantially to 2008 after it peaked at 80 percent in 1992. Likewise, glass containers which witnessed a slight fluctuation falling from 50 percent to 40 percent within the year 1982 to 1989 then increased substantially reaching it’s prime at 60 percent in the year 2008. On the other hand, it was an upward trend for aluminum cans, which peaked at a little over 40 percent. Whereas, plastics, the least recycled materials with a little under 10 percent recycling ratio in the year 2009.
The chart below represents the proportion of four various
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
materials
(paper & cardboard, glass container, aluminum cans, plastics) which
were recycled
in a specific country for 28 years from 1982 to 2010.
Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace



Overall
, we could notice from the chart that, paper and cardboard were the most recycled
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
material
within the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
1990 to 1994 with an 80
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ratio
.
Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
However
we could
also
depict from the same chart that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
material
with the least
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percent
was plastic which was well under 10
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percent
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
1989,
moreover
, we could
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
that all the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
materials
had the highest recycling
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ratio
in 2008 apart from paper and cardboard which experienced a fall.
Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace



Use “in regard to”, “with regard to”, or more simply “regarding”.
With regards to
paper and cardboard, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ratio
decreased
substantially
to 2008 after it peaked at 80
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percent
in 1992.
Likewise
, glass containers which witnessed a slight fluctuation falling from 50
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percent
to 40
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percent
within the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
1982 to 1989 then increased
substantially
reaching
Did you mean “its” (possessive pronoun) instead of ‘it’s’ (short for ‘it is’)?
it’s
prime at 60
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percent
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
2008.

On the other hand
, it was an upward trend for aluminum cans, which peaked at a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
little
over 40
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percent
. Whereas, plastics, the least recycled
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
materials
with a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
little
under 10
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percent
recycling
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ratio
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
2009.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.

Academic
  American English
2 paragraphs
203 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.