Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. jeGp

The line graph gives information about the weekly individual consumption of chicken, lamb, beef and fish in an unspecified European country from 1979 to 2004. The measurement of units is in Grams. At the first glance, it seems obvious that the weekly consumption of chicken increased, while that of lamb and beef reduced. The rate at which fish was eaten remained more or less constant. The consumption of chicken for an individual increased from slightly less than 150 units a week in 1979 to approximately 250 units in 2004. For fish, though, the feeding trend remained flat all throughout {1979 to 2004) at around 50 units. The demand for the other two meat products reduced during this time. First, the feasting of lamb by an individual fell from exactly 150 units in 1979 to close to 75 units in 2004. However, a peculiar pattern was observed in beef's consumption. Its weekly intake fluctuated between 150 units and 250 units for the first 10 years 1979 to 1989). Subsequently, it reduced consistently to halt at a mark of close to 110 units in 2004.

The line graph gives information about the weekly individual You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexpenditureutilizationdrinking
consumption
 of chicken, lamb, beef and fish in an unspecified European country from 1979 to 2004. The measurement of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrewgroupsystementity
units
 is in Grams.

At the first
 glance, it seems obvious that the weekly You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexpenditureutilizationdrinking
consumption
 of chicken increased, while that of lamb and beef This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alleviated
reduced
. The rate at which fish was eaten
 remained more or less constant.

The You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexpenditureutilizationdrinking
consumption
 of chicken for an individual increased from slightly
 less than 150 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrewgroupsystementity
units
 a week in 1979 to approximately 250 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrewgroupsystementity
units
 in 2004. For fish, though, the feeding trend remained flat all throughout Unpaired symbol: '}' seems to be missing
{
1979 to 2004Unpaired symbol: '(' seems to be missing
)
 at around 50 units.

The demand for the other two meat products This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alleviated
reduced
 during this time. First
, the feasting of lamb by an individual fell from exactly 150 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrewgroupsystementity
units
 in 1979 to close to 75 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrewgroupsystementity
units
 in 2004.

However
, a peculiar pattern was observed
 in beef's You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexpenditureutilizationdrinking
consumption
. Its weekly intake fluctuated between 150 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrewgroupsystementity
units
 and 250 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrewgroupsystementity
units
 for the first
 10 years 1979 to 1989Unpaired symbol: '(' seems to be missing
)
. Subsequently
, it This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alleviated
reduced
consistently
 to halt at a mark of close to 110 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrewgroupsystementity
units
 in 2004. 