Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

the graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom,Sweden,Italy and Portugal between 1967and 2007

the graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967and 2007 oOaD

The provided multi-linear graph illustrates the information about the average emissions of carbon dioxide per person in four different countries during the time period of 1967and 2007. Overall, it is clearly seen that carbon dioxide emission in United Kingdom and Sweden was decreased in the time period. while, in Italy and Portugal nations showed opposite trend with gradually increase. Looking at the details, in 1967, average of carbon dioxide emission per person in United Kingdom was almost 11 metric tonnes. Afterthat, it decrease dramatically with 2 metric tonne. In contrast, Sweden took second position over the nations which observed almost 8. 5 metric tonne in 1967 then, it increased from 8. 6 to 10. 2 metric tonne respectively. the carbon dioxide emission per person was decline constantly having the tonnes of 5. 7 in 2007. furtheranalyises, Italy and Portugal were showing upward trend over the time period. In initial years, CO2 emission per person in Italy was rise up from 4. 2 to 6. 1 metric tonnes inorder. Afterthat, carbon dioxide was increase and reached to second peak point between 1987and 2007. However, in Portugal carbon dioxide emission per person was 1. 7 metric tonnes in 1967 and it increased constantly from 1987 to 2007 which accounted with 5. 8 metric tonne.

The provided multi-linear graph illustrates the information about the average You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdischargeradiation
emissions
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsootgraphite
carbon
 dioxide per You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcustomerbodylifewomansomebodycharacter
person
 in four This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
 countries during the time period of 1967and 2007. Overall
, it is clearly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witnessed
seen
 that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsootgraphite
carbon
 dioxide You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdischargeradiation
emission
A determiner is probably missing here: "in the United Kingdom".in the United Kingdom
in United Kingdom
 and Sweden was decreased
 in the time period. This sentence does not start with an uppercase letterWhile
while
, in Italy and Portugal nations This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demonstratedportrayedindicateddisplayed
showed
 opposite trend with gradually
 increase. Looking at the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :particulars
details
, in 1967, average of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsootgraphite
carbon
 dioxide You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdischargeradiation
emission
 per You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcustomerbodylifewomansomebodycharacter
person
A determiner is probably missing here: "in the United Kingdom".in the United Kingdom
in United Kingdom
 was almost 11 metric tonnes. Possible spelling mistake found.After that
Afterthat
, it Did you mean "decreases"?decreases
decrease
dramatically
 with 2 metric Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: "tonnes".tonnes
tonne
. In contrast
, Sweden took second position over the nations which observed almost 8. 5 metric Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: "tonnes".tonnes
tonne
 in 1967 then, it increased from 8. 6 to 10. 2 metric Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: "tonnes".tonnes
tonne
respectively
. This sentence does not start with an uppercase letterThe
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsootgraphite
carbon
 dioxide You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdischargeradiation
emission
 per You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcustomerbodylifewomansomebodycharacter
person
 was decline constantly
 having the tonnes of 5. 7 in 2007. This sentence does not start with an uppercase letterFurtheranalyises
furtheranalyises
, Italy and Portugal were showing upward trend over the time period. In initial years, CO2 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdischargeradiation
emission
 per You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcustomerbodylifewomansomebodycharacter
person
 in Italy was rise up from 4. 2 to 6. 1 metric tonnes Possible spelling mistake found.in order
inorder
. Possible spelling mistake found.After that
Afterthat
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsootgraphite
carbon
 dioxide was increase and reached to second peak point between 1987and 2007. However
, in Portugal You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsootgraphite
carbon
 dioxide You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdischargeradiation
emission
 per You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcustomerbodylifewomansomebodycharacter
person
 was 1. 7 metric tonnes in 1967 and it increased constantly
 from 1987 to 2007 which accounted with 5. 8 metric Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: "tonnes".tonnes
tonne
. 