Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The graph below shows average Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom,, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2000.

The linear plot depicts standard output of Carbon dioxide discharge per individual in the European countries over a forty-year period. It can clearly be seen that the emissions of Carbon acidic gas in the United Kingdom and Sweden started with elevated amount of the stated ratio. tric tones. Furthermore, discharge of Carbon acidic gas in Sweden was almost 8. 5 metric tones in the year 1967, ten years after it was rose to a peak and was seen above 10 metric tones. Unexpectedly it was declared to nose dived by the years 1987 and rate as absolute 7 metric tones, the section of CO2 emissions stood at around 6 metric tones for the year 1997. Finally, by the end of the period they face a sharp dwindle and merely rated as 5 metric tones. On the other hand, the output for Italy accounted for merely over 4 metric tones, 1977 the year it started to surge and was as top of 6 metric tones as estimated, demonstrated a similar rising pattern by 1987 remain as top of 6 metric tones. 1997 it began to change and was guessed as more the 7 metric tones, at the end of the quantities the year 2007 it increased sharply and was announced as nearly 8 metric tones. Moreover, the data for Carbon Dioxide release for Portugal overall was 1 metric tone in 1967, 1977 the year the metric started to sky rocket and was approximately 2 metric tones, it started to boost in 1987 and was roughly 3 metric tones. After another 10 years it added 2 more metric tones and was written as 5 metric tones. Lastly, between 1997 and 2007 the details of the outlay was plateau more or less 5 metric tones, they spot balloon effect within the years 1967 to 2007.
The linear plot depicts standard output of
Carbon
dioxide discharge per individual in the European countries over a forty-year period. It can
clearly
be
seen
that the emissions of
Carbon
acidic gas in the United Kingdom and Sweden
started
with elevated amount of the stated ratio.
tric
tones
.
Furthermore
, discharge of
Carbon
acidic gas in Sweden was almost 8. 5 metric
tones
in the
year
1967, ten years after it was rose to a peak and was
seen
above 10 metric
tones
.
Unexpectedly
it
was declared
to nose dived by the years 1987 and rate as absolute 7 metric
tones
, the section of CO2 emissions stood at around 6 metric
tones
for the
year
1997.
Finally
, by the
end
of the period they face a sharp dwindle and
merely
rated as 5 metric tones.

On the other hand
, the output for Italy accounted for
merely
over 4 metric
tones
, 1977 the
year
it
started
to surge and was as top of 6 metric
tones
as estimated, demonstrated a similar rising pattern by 1987 remain as top of 6 metric
tones
. 1997 it began to
change
and
was guessed
as more the 7 metric
tones
, at the
end
of the quantities the
year
2007 it increased
sharply
and
was announced
as
nearly
8 metric
tones
.
Moreover
, the data for
Carbon
Dioxide release for Portugal
overall
was 1 metric
tone
in 1967, 1977 the
year
the metric
started
to
sky rocket
and was approximately 2 metric
tones
, it
started
to boost in 1987 and was roughly 3 metric
tones
. After another 10 years it
added
2 more metric
tones
and
was written
as 5 metric
tones
.
Lastly
, between 1997 and 2007 the
details
of the outlay was plateau more or less 5 metric
tones
, they spot balloon effect within the years 1967 to 2007.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The graph below shows average Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, , Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2000.

Academic
  American English
2 paragraphs
302 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts