The line graph provides information about the number of people who moved from rural areas to cities in Iran, Indonesia and Russia from 1990 to 2015. In general, movement numbers from both Iran and Indonesia country increased dramatically, while there was a significant decrease.
Looking in more detail, the graph illustrates that there was a rapid fall in Iran movement numbers. For example, between 1990 and 2005 the numbers declined gradually from around 40 to around 10. There was then an upward trend in the number, reaching a peak of nearly 95 in 2015.
The number of Indonesia movement showed a similar trend. To be specific, from 1990 to 2000 the number fell steadily. However, Indonisia people movement soared by around 95 in final year.
In contrast, Russia people movement views a different trend. Between 1990 and 2000 the people movement remain steadily, before plummeting sharply to nearly 20 over a periode of year
One notable point is that in 2015 both Iran and Indonesia people movement were the same
The line graph provides information about the
number
of
people
who
moved
from rural areas to cities in Iran, Indonesia and Russia from 1990 to 2015.
In general
,
movement
numbers
from both Iran and Indonesia country increased
dramatically
, while there was a significant decrease.
Looking in more detail, the graph illustrates that there was a rapid fall in Iran
movement
numbers
.
For example
, between 1990 and 2005 the
numbers
declined
gradually
from around 40 to around 10. There was then an upward trend in the
number
, reaching a peak of
nearly
95 in 2015.
The
number
of Indonesia
movement
showed
a similar trend. To be specific, from 1990 to 2000 the
number
fell
steadily
.
However
,
Indonisia
people
movement
soared by around 95 in final year.
In contrast
, Russia
people
movement
views a
different
trend. Between 1990 and 2000 the
people
movement
remain
steadily
,
before
plummeting
sharply
to
nearly
20 over a
periode
of year
One notable point is that in 2015 both Iran and Indonesia
people
movement
were the
same