Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The given pie graphs above illustrate the information about the units of production by fuel sources which were coal, oil, natural gas, hydropower and nuclear power in 2 countries which were Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.

The given pie graphs above illustrate the information about the units of production by fuel sources which were coal, oil, natural gas, hydropower and nuclear power in 2 countries which were Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. yXaxJ
The given pie graphs above illustrate the information about the units of production by fuel sources which were coal, oil, natural gas, hydropower and nuclear power in 2 countries which were Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. Overall, when looked the pie charts in general, it can be seen that Australia had 100 units in total production in 1980, while it produced 170 units of electricity in total production in 2000. France produced 90 units in 1980. In 2000, it doubled than 1980. Initially, we can see that in Australia, there were 50 units and 10 units of electricity produced by coal and oil, respectively. However, in 2000, coal increased by far the most important to 130 units. Oil decreased gradually, which was from 10 to 2. Another country which was France, there were nuclear power and natural gas, which were 5 and 25, respectively in 1980. Moreover, natural gas went down dramatically from 25 to 2 in 20 periods which were 1980 and 2000. Furthermore, nuclear power soared significantly to 126 units in 2000.
The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
pie graphs above illustrate the information about the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
of production by fuel sources which were coal, oil, natural gas, hydropower and nuclear power in 2 countries which were Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.

Overall
, when looked the pie charts
in general
, it can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
that Australia had 100
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
in total production in 1980, while it produced 170
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
of electricity in total production in 2000. France produced 90
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
in 1980. In 2000, it
Use "doubler" to make a comparison with this adjective.
doubled
than 1980.

Initially
, we can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
that in Australia, there were 50
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
and 10
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
of electricity produced by coal and oil,
respectively
.
However
, in 2000, coal increased by far the most
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
to 130
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
. Oil decreased
gradually
, which was from 10 to 2. Another country which was France, there were nuclear power and natural gas, which were 5 and 25,
respectively
in 1980.
Moreover
, natural gas went down
dramatically
from 25 to 2 in 20 periods which were 1980 and 2000.
Furthermore
, nuclear power soared
significantly
to 126
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
in 2000.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The given pie graphs above illustrate the information about the units of production by fuel sources which were coal, oil, natural gas, hydropower and nuclear power in 2 countries which were Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.

Academic
  American English
3 paragraphs
176 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts