The ostensible diagrams detail the information about the alterations in a prehistoric tool structure between 1. 4 million years ago and 0. 8 million years ago.
Lookimg from an overall perdpective, it can be redaily apparent that specific number of variations were witnessed by a given tool image.
To start with, 1. 4 million years ago front view of tool wss not in proper shape, however after this in 0. 8million years ago, its size abd shape were came in distinct way because beneath side of equipment was entirely in round shape and its whole picture can be compared with a drop of water.
Whereas, side view of tool was much smoother in 0. 8 million years ago with narrow shape than its counterpart years of 1. 4 million. Finally, the height of back view was remained unchanged in both periods with 5 cm, on the contrary it was not much developed in 1. 4 milliin years ago, whilst in 0. 8 million years ago significant variations in the shape of tool were experienced.
The ostensible diagrams detail the information about the alterations in a prehistoric
tool
structure between 1. 4
million
years ago and 0. 8
million
years ago.
Lookimg
from an
overall
perdpective
, it can be
redaily
apparent that specific number of variations
were witnessed
by a
given
tool
image.
To
start
with, 1. 4
million
years ago front view of
tool
wss
not in proper
shape
,
however
after this in 0.
8million
years ago, its size
abd
shape
were
came
in distinct way
because
beneath side of equipment was
entirely
in round
shape
and its whole picture can
be compared
with a drop of water.
Whereas
, side view of
tool
was much smoother in 0. 8
million
years ago with narrow
shape
than its counterpart years of 1. 4
million
.
Finally
, the height of back view
was remained
unchanged in both periods with 5 cm,
on the contrary
it was not much developed in 1. 4
milliin
years ago, whilst in 0. 8
million
years ago significant variations in the
shape
of
tool
were experienced
.