The diagaram delineates the differences between prehistoric tools from 1. 4 and 0. 8 million years ago. From overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the earlier tool has less subtle edges while the newer tool is more refined.
Comparing the two tools based on the frontal view, the 800, 000 years tool is sharper with more rounded sides. The older one seems slightly slender and rough-cut, displaying primitiveness
From the side view, the 1. 4 million years ago is thicker and craggy than the smoother 800, 000 years ago one. Lastly, there is a major differences viewed from the back side. The newer tool almost imitate the frontal view and wider on the bottom. On the other hand, the older one has heavily craced side and uneven shape.
The
diagaram
delineates the differences between prehistoric
tools
from 1. 4 and 0. 8 million years ago. From
overall
perspective, it is
readily
apparent that the earlier
tool
has less subtle edges while the newer
tool
is more refined.
Comparing the two
tools
based on the frontal view, the 800, 000 years
tool
is sharper with more rounded
sides
. The older one seems
slightly
slender and rough-
cut
, displaying primitiveness
From the side view, the 1. 4 million years ago is thicker and craggy than the smoother 800, 000 years ago one.
Lastly
, there is a major differences viewed from the back side. The newer
tool
almost imitate the frontal view and wider on the bottom.
On the other hand
, the older one has
heavily
craced
side and uneven shape.