Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The diagram below shows the percentage of good quality river water in four countries from 1995 to 2010. It also shows the prediction for 2018. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph displays the changes in the proportion of river water in high quality in four countries between 1995 and 2018. Between 1995 and 2010, the percentage of good quality river water in country A showed a very slight increase from about 96% to 98%. However, after that the percentage of good quality water started to decline and is predicted to reach 96% by 2018. In 1995, the good quality river water in country B and country C stood at around 94%, but after that the percentage of good quality river water in country B has showed a steady increase upto the present time and has reached approximately 98%. It is predicted to show a slight fall till 2018. In contrast, the percentage of good quality river water in country C decreased moderately and reached a level of 87% by 2008. After 2008, the situation in country C improved and good quality river water showed a steady rise and reached 94% by 2013. This trend in expected to continue and percentage of good quality river water will soar to 96% by 2018. The worst quality river water was in country D where 85% of river water was in good quality between 1995 and 2008. It peaked at about 92% in between in 2000. In 2008, the good quality river water in country D again showed a small peak but ever since has shown a slight fall and this fall is expected to continue in future also. Overall, the percentage of good quality river water in country A and B showed a relatively stable trend where as in countries C and D showed opposing trends with some fluctuations.
The line graph displays the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
changes
in the proportion of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
river
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
in high
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
in four
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
between 1995 and 2018.

Between 1995 and 2010, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
river
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
A
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
showed
a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
slight increase from about 96% to 98%.
However
, after that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
started
to decline and
is predicted
to reach 96% by 2018.

In 1995, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
river
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
B and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
C stood at around 94%,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
after that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
river
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
B has
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
showed
a steady increase
Possible spelling mistake found.
upto
the present time and has reached approximately 98%. It
is predicted
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
show
a slight fall till 2018.
In contrast
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
river
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
C decreased
moderately
and reached a level of 87% by 2008. After 2008, the situation in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
C
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
improved
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
river
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
showed
a steady rise and reached 94% by 2013. This trend in
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
expected
to continue and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
river
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
will soar to 96% by 2018.

The worst
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
river
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
was in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
D where 85% of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
river
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
was in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
between 1995 and 2008. It peaked at about 92% in between in 2000. In 2008, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
river
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
D again
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
showed
a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
small
peak
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
ever since has shown a slight fall and this fall is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
expected
to continue in future
also
.

Overall
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
river
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
A and B
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
showed
a
relatively
stable trend
Did you mean “whereas”?
where as
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
C and D
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
showed
opposing trends with
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
fluctuations.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The diagram below shows the percentage of good quality river water in four countries from 1995 to 2010. It also shows the prediction for 2018.

Academic
  American English
5 paragraphs
278 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts